Pass4sure 4H0-028 dumps | 4H0-028 actual questions |

4H0-028 Hyperion Certified Professional (R) System 9 Planning 4.1

Study pilot Prepared by Hyperion Dumps Experts 4H0-028 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

4H0-028 exam Dumps Source : Hyperion Certified Professional (R) System 9 Planning 4.1

Test Code : 4H0-028
Test name : Hyperion Certified Professional (R) System 9 Planning 4.1
Vendor name : Hyperion
exam questions : 100 actual Questions

surprised to peer 4H0-028 ultra-cutting-edge dumps!
Im confident to endorse 4H0-028 questions answers and exam simulator to everybitof and sundry who prepares to seize their 4H0-028 exam. This is the maximum up to date coaching facts for the 4H0-028 to live had online as it actually covers entire 4H0-028 exam, This one is in truth appropriate, which im able to vouch for as I passed this 4H0-028 exam closing week. Questions are updated and accurate, so I didnt acquire any problem within the path of the exam and were given perquisite marks and that i especially recommend

Take Advantage, employ questions and answers to ensure your success.
I commenced virtually considering 4H0-028 exam simply when you explored me approximately it, and now, having chosen it, I sense that I acquire settled at the perquisite preference. I handed exam with exclusive opinions utilising Dumps of 4H0-028 exam and got 89% marks which is very suitable for me. In the wake of passing 4H0-028 exam, I acquire numerous openings for travail now. Much liked Dumps for assisting me evolution my vocation. You shaked the beer!

You simply exigency a weekend to prepare 4H0-028 examination with these dumps.
I acquire never used the sort of super Dumps for my mastering. It assisted rightly for the 4H0-028 exam. I already used the and passed my 4H0-028 exam. It is the flexible material to apply. However, I changed into a underneath common candidate, it made me pass inside the exam too. I used best for the studying and by no means used another material. I will preserve on using your product for my future tests too. Got ninety eight%.

Preparing 4H0-028 exam is matter of some hours now.
i am ranked very excessive amongst my magnificence buddies on the listing of extraordinary students however it besthappened after I registered in this for a few exam assist. It turned into the high ranking analyzing programin this that helped me in joining the excessive ranks at the side of other extraordinary students of my class. The assets on this are commendable due to the fact theyre unique and extremely useful for preparationthru 4H0-028, 4H0-028 dumps and 4H0-028 books. I am lighthearted to location in writing those phrases of appreciation due to the fact this merits it. thanks.

Little study for 4H0-028 examination, got outstanding success.
I cracked my 4H0-028 exam on my first try with seventy two.Five% in just 2 days of education. Thank you on your valuable questions. I did the exam with notany worry. Looking ahead to smooth the 4H0-028 exam along side your assist.

Belive me or not! This resource of 4H0-028 questions works.
4H0-028 exam became certainly difficult for me as i was no longer getting enough time for the coaching. finding no manner out, I took serve from the dump. I furthermore took serve from professional Certification guide. The sell off was top notch. It handled everybitof the topics in an smooth and pleasant manner. could amass via most of them with minute effort. responded everybitof the query in only eighty one minutes and were given 97 mark. Felt virtually glad. thank you a lot to for their valuable steering.

outstanding source modern day outstanding state-of-the-art dumps, accurate answers.
Going through exam questions has Come to live a addiction whilst exam 4H0-028 comes. And with tests arising in pretty much 6 days exam questions changed into getting greater critical. however with topics I want some reference pilot to proceed every so often in order that i would amass higher help. route to their exam questions that made everybitof of it clean to amass the subjectsinterior your head easily which would otherwise might live not possible. And its miles everybitof due to merchandise that I managed to attain 980 in my exam. Thats the highest score in my elegance.

Do a quick and smart pass, prepare those 4H0-028 Questions and answers.
That is genuinely the fulfillment of, not mine. Very person pleasant 4H0-028 exam simulator and actual 4H0-028 QAs.

amazed to peer 4H0-028 actual exam questions!
Your questions exactly similar to actual one. Passed the 4H0-028 test the other day. i would acquire no longer completed it at the very time as no longer your check homework materials. Various months agene I fizzling that test the notable time I took it. exam questions and Exam Simulator are a first rate thing for me. I completed the test frightfully simply this point.

proper region to ascertain 4H0-028 actual test questions paper.
I will endorse you to Come back back perquisite right here to location off everybitof fears associated with 4H0-028 certification due to the fact this is a greatplatform to present you with assured goods to your arrangements. I used to live concerned for 4H0-028 exam but everybitof thanks to who provided me with exceptional products for my practise. I was absolutely involved aboutmy fulfillment however it become handiest 4H0-028 exam engine that multiplied my fulfillment self notion and now i am zeal pride on this unconditional help. Hats off to you and your improbable offerings for everybitof students and professionals!

Hyperion Hyperion Certified Professional (R)

SAP and Hyperion purchasers extend industry performance management | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

With the combination of Hyperion performance Suite and SAP BW, Hyperion and SAP shoppers can now view statistics from several statistics sources in Hyperion’s effortless-to-use, personalized dashboards, extending their Hyperion and SAP solutions. Dashboards give a graphical monitor of efficiency information spanning monetary and operational measures, giving users the information they exigency to panoply screen and manage enterprise consequences. Hyperion and SAP client, Maxxium global – overseas revenue, advertising and marketing and distribution community for top rate manufacturers of wine and spirits – says that the combination of Hyperion and SAP items will champion maximize the enterprise’s industry software investments.“both Hyperion and SAP are key to their long-term company and IT recommendations,” talked about Eelco Spiker, manufacturer Consolidation supervisor at Maxxium worldwide. “This prolonged relationship will aid us capitalize even more advantageous cost out of their latest investments, and present us powerful recent query and reporting capabilities for their SAP programs.”The Hyperion performance Suite – produced from Hyperion Intelligence and Hyperion SQR – along with Hyperion Essbase, gives the industry intelligence basis for Hyperion’s enterprise performance administration options. Hyperion Intelligence 8.2, which supplies potent ad hoc question and evaluation, efficaciously completed the certification checks for SAP BW, reaching “certified for SAP NetWeaver” status. Hyperion SQR eight.2, which gives award-profitable, presentation-pleasant experiences, has been licensed for mySAP company Suite.

together, Hyperion options and SAP NetWeaver will enable customers to:

  • extend question, reporting and analysis into personalized dashboards for everybitof users throughout the commercial enterprise, automatically integrating suggestions from SAP systems
  • effectively create intuitive, mission-crucial creation stories with Hyperion SQR
  • without retard access and unify SAP BW assistance with information from exterior sources inside a single Hyperion document
  • “the combination of their easy-to-use industry intelligence solutions with SAP NetWeaver is censorious to purchasers who wish to extract the optimum cost from the assistance that drives their organizations,” said John Kopcke, CTO for Hyperion. “The carrying on with relationship between SAP and Hyperion will aid customers extend the value of industry performance administration and BI to personnel in everybitof corners of the enterprise while maximizing scalability and efficiency.”For the terminal two years, Hyperion SQR has been honored as a “Gold well-known person Winner” of the SAP FAQ annual participants preference top 25 materiel and technology award. The SAP FAQ, the more than 15,000 member neighborhood constituted of the main SAP specialists, chose Hyperion SQR as a product that had the “top-quality superb acquire an repercussion on” on SAP R/3 and mySAP company Suite implementations.

    source: Hyperion

    LexisNexis CounselLink Earns safe Harbor Certification | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    CARY, N.C.--(company WIRE)--LexisNexis® prison & knowledgeable, a leading issuer of content and technology options, introduced these days that the LexisNexis CounselLink® industry has earned its protected Harbor Certification. The secure Harbor certification means the CounselLink company complies with a set of privacy concepts that establish statistics privateness requisites among 15-member nations together with the U.S. and nations in the European Union.

    These specifications govern how a enterprise may bring together, transfer or dole personal data, corresponding to notifying consumers earlier than their very own data is accumulated, offering a mechanism for opting-out, and establishing a manner for dispute resolution. Participation by route of U.S.-primarily based groups is voluntary, notwithstanding participation requires an enforceable and written self-certification process that acquire to live validated yearly.

    “We currently champion international groups in multiple international locations world wide and this certification no longer simplest ensures we're in compliance, however additionally helps the compliance efforts of their consumers,” stated Jonah Paransky, vice chairman and managing director at the CounselLink business. “secure Harbor certification is a further step towards featuring assurances and awesome champion for their becoming world customer ground with a Great presence in the European Union.”

    The vital magnitude of facts privateness turned into identified as one of the vital cloud business’s most notable emerging tendencies through Hyperion analysis, a division of Hyperion international companions, in its MarketView™ record overlaying industry legal management options.

    “We ascertain that as both company legislation departments and their outside advice swirl into more and more international-oriented, information privateness necessities develop into high precedence,” referred to Ralph Schroeder, Managing Director of Hyperion analysis. “The protected Harbor certification process provides purchasers a crucial validation of a solution’s ability to meet strange information privacy requirements.”

    The CounselLink company is a number one company of cloud-primarily based application for enterprise legal administration – an emerging market for industry software for prison departments for live counted administration, criminal disburse administration and legal holds. It additionally provides procedure, analytical and benchmarking consulting functions. current estimates location the typical ELM market at approximately $500 million and growing in excess of 10 p.c each year.

    For extra counsel please talk over with: confidence/

    About LexisNexis prison & knowledgeable

    LexisNexis® criminal & knowledgeable is a leading international company of content material and know-how solutions that allow gurus in prison, corporate, tax, govt, academic and non-income companies to design suggested choices and obtain more advantageous industry consequences. As a digital pioneer, the enterprise was the primary to carry felony and company guidance online with its Lexis® and Nexis® functions. these days, LexisNexis criminal & professional harnesses leading-part expertise and world-type content material, to aid gurus travail in quicker, more convenient and more constructive techniques. through shut collaboration with its valued clientele, the industry ensures agencies can leverage its options to reduce possibility, improve productiveness, enhance profitability and grow their enterprise. a fragment of Reed Elsevier Inc., LexisNexis felony & professional serves shoppers in more than 100 countries with 10,000 personnel worldwide.

    LexisNexis helps gurus at legislation corporations and felony departments of everybitof sizes manage the company constituent of their commemorate or legal departments with creative software and mobile solutions for consumer relationship administration, aggressive intelligence gathering and evaluation, time and billing management, depend management, customer evaluation, prison holds and extra.

    massive Alaska looks to minute Nuclear | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    toshiba plantToshiba employer Diagram of a small-scale nuclear plant proposed for Galena, Alaska.

    In a quest to lessen power fees, some municipalities in the oil-prosperous state of Alaska wish to small-scale nuclear energy.

    Galena, a village of 580 americans on the Yukon River, has been working for years with energy great Toshiba to bring a minute nuclear energy plant to their village.

    Now a Fairbanks developer, John Reeves, is proposing a a bit better plant, designed by means of Hyperion vigour generation of Santa Fe, N.M., for the Fairbanks enviornment.

    “personally, it’s the most dependable energy there is,” Mr. Reeves talked about remaining week. “No carbon dioxide.”

    both tasks involve minute reactors that could live buried underground and duty for many years with out the exigency for refueling.

    Toshiba’s reactor, dubbed the 4S for “tremendous-protected, minute and simple,” is designed to supply 10 megawatts of electricity for 30 years with out refueling. it would live cooled by liquid metallic. (Toshiba is furthermore setting up a 50MW version.)

    Hyperion is promising a reactor that may produce 25MW for five to 10 years and uses uranium hydride as a amalgam gas and temperature-moderator.

    Alaska’s governor helps the idea.

    “fully i can survey nuclear taking fragment in a stint in their power agenda,” Gov. Sarah Palin wrote in an electronic mail message remaining week. “Small-scale nuclear is a thrilling prospect and suits with construction of their greater typical sources of non-renewables.

    “Nuclear without doubt plays an notable energy role in their country,” Ms. Palin delivered. “I aid it, and now it can live pleasing to hear what in the community affected Alaskans whisper concerning the potentialities in their state.”

    both plant life portray a recent system to nuclear energy — minute reactors that can furthermore live mass-produced, require minute preservation, and are theoretically easier to allow and construct than gigantic-scale flora (Babcock & Wilcox and NuScale power are additionally pursuing the thought, amongst different groups.)

    Neither Hyperion nor Toshiba has utilized for design certification from the Nuclear Regulatory fee, youngsters, and an N.R.C. spokesman, Scott Burnell, said both concepts are unusual adequate that the certification procedure can live on the lengthy aspect.

    Hyperion chiefly has lots of travail to accomplish before even making employ of for certification, Mr. Burnell stated. “they're almost at rectangular one.”

    as soon as a design is certified as protected, a assignment developer will quiet exigency to cozy a license to construct and operate the plant at a given website, that can additionally seize years.

    And there's already opposition along the Yukon — from the Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council — and in Ester, the location Mr. Reeves is working.

    “The fundamental conception seems pretty cool,” mentioned Deirdre Helfferich, the writer of the Ester Republic newspaper. “but there’s nonetheless the righteous concern of leaving behind nasty consume for a entire lot of hundreds of years.”

    While it is very hard stint to elect dependable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people amass ripoff due to choosing wrong service. design it certain to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is notable to us. Specially they seize care of review, reputation, ripoff report complaint, trust, validity, report and scam. If you survey any erroneous report posted by their competitors with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, ripoff report, scam, complaint or something relish this, just maintain in intellect that there are always atrocious people damaging reputation of suitable services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams drill questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Bootcamp Menu

    000-233 free pdf | CSSGB study guide | DP-002W dumps questions | C2150-614 test prep | 250-255 drill questions | NS0-170 test prep | 70-533 free pdf | 200-101 drill questions | 500-452 sample test | 000-N21 questions and answers | P2170-035 study guide | MB5-625 drill test | 000-219 braindumps | 000-347 drill test | 9L0-615 braindumps | 310-600 drill test | 000-570 brain dumps | 200-105 actual questions | 9L0-206 bootcamp | 700-037 drill exam |

    When you retain these 4H0-028 exam questions , you will amass 100% marks. is the ultimate preparation source for passing the Hyperion 4H0-028 exam. They acquire carefully complied and assembled actual exam questions, which are updated with the very frequency as actual exam is updated, and reviewed by industry experts. Huge Discount Coupon and Promo codes are offered for Great discount. acquire its experts operating continuously for the collection of actual exam questions of 4H0-028. everybitof the pass4sure questions and answers of 4H0-028 accrued by their institution are seemed into and updated by using their 4H0-028 assured group. They linger related to the applicants showed up inside the 4H0-028 test to amass their reviews about the 4H0-028 test, they accumulate 4H0-028 exam suggestions and traps, their revel in about the tactics applied as a fragment of the actual 4H0-028 exam, the errors they achieved in the actual exam and later on modify their material as needs be. Click Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as underneath;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for everybitof tests on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for everybitof Orders
    When you luxuriatein their pass4sure questions and answers, you will sense positive about every one of the subject matters of exam and feel that your perception has been notably moved forward. These pass4sure questions and answers arent simply drill questions, those are actual exam questions and answers that are enough to pass the 4H0-028 exam at the first attempt.

    On the off casual that you are searching for 4H0-028 drill Test containing actual Test Questions, you are at opportune place. They acquire collected database of questions from Actual Exams keeping thinking the intermission goal to enable you to route and pass your exam on the first attempt. everybitof preparation materials on the site are Up To Date and verified by their experts. furnish latest and updated drill Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for recent syllabus of Hyperion 4H0-028 Exam. drill their actual Questions and Answers to improve your insight and pass your exam with high Marks. They guarantee your accomplishment in the Test Center, covering every one of the themes of exam and construct your lore of the 4H0-028 exam. Pass 4 beyond any doubt with their precise questions.

    100% Pass Guarantee

    Our 4H0-028 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Brain dumps verified and certified including references and clarifications (where material). Their objective to amass the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first attempt yet Really improve Your lore about the 4H0-028 exam topics.

    4H0-028 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in high attribute Study pilot that you can download in your Computer or some other gadget and start setting up your 4H0-028 exam. Print Complete 4H0-028 Study Guide, convey with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and luxuriatein your Exam Prep. You can amass to updated 4H0-028 Exam exam questions from your online record anytime.

    inside seeing the actual exam material of the brain dumps at you can without a considerable measure of a stretch out build up your specialty. For the IT authorities, it is fundamental to improve their abilities as appeared by their travail require. They design it essential for their clients to convey certification exam with the assistance of certified and staunch blue exam material. For a wonderful future in its space, their brain dumps are the best choice. A best dumps making is an essential section that makes it direct for you to seize Hyperion certifications. Regardless, 4H0-028 braindumps PDF offers settlement for applicants. The IT certification is a basic troublesome attempt on the off casual that one doesn't find certifiable course as evident asset material. Hence, they acquire bona fide and updated material for the organizing of accreditation exam. It is essential to amass to the pilot material on the off casual that one needs toward spare time. As you require packs of time to search for restored and bona fide exam material for taking the IT certification exam. if you find that at one place, what could live superior to this? Its essentially that has what you require. You can spare time and maintain up a vital separation from inconvenience if you purchase Adobe IT accreditation from their site. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for everybitof exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for everybitof Orders

    Download your Hyperion Certified Professional (R) System 9 Planning 4.1 Study pilot promptly after purchasing and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep perquisite Now!

    Since 1997, we have provided a high quality education to our community with an emphasis on academic excellence and strong personal values.

    Killexams 312-49 drill Test | Killexams 70-343 exam prep | Killexams M2020-615 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-033 free pdf | Killexams HP2-B86 examcollection | Killexams RH-202 braindumps | Killexams ACCP study guide | Killexams P11-101 braindumps | Killexams CDCA-ADEX cram | Killexams 000-484 brain dumps | Killexams HP2-K37 questions and answers | Killexams 650-663 questions and answers | Killexams 050-708 drill test | Killexams 9L0-061 free pdf | Killexams 700-410 free pdf download | Killexams 000-N13 drill questions | Killexams PRF sample test | Killexams 310-880 test prep | Killexams EE0-503 study guide | Killexams 000-606 test prep |

    Exam Simulator : Pass4sure 4H0-028 Exam Simulator

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams 71-687 dumps questions | Killexams P2070-048 test questions | Killexams 1Z0-206 questions and answers | Killexams E20-080 study guide | Killexams A2090-735 bootcamp | Killexams HP2-E14 drill test | Killexams C2140-135 drill exam | Killexams 70-630 test prep | Killexams ISEB-PM1 exam prep | Killexams HP0-729 free pdf download | Killexams HP0-M47 exam prep | Killexams 299-01 free pdf | Killexams RHIA test prep | Killexams C9560-568 actual questions | Killexams JN0-730 exam questions | Killexams 70-511-VB VCE | Killexams HP2-E46 brain dumps | Killexams C9560-515 free pdf | Killexams 000-181 braindumps | Killexams CAT-160 dumps |

    Hyperion Certified Professional (R) System 9 Planning 4.1

    Pass 4 certain 4H0-028 dumps | 4H0-028 actual questions |

    Allscripts Healthcare Solutions (MDRX) Q3 2017 Results - Earnings convene Transcript | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    No result found, try recent keyword!Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDRX) Q3 2017 Earnings convene November 2, 2017 4:30 PM ET Executives Seth R ... system with Allscripts' PM system. Additionally, interest in revenue cycle m...

    NFL Nostalgia: Ranking the Best Coaches in NFL History | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Focus On Sport/Getty Images

    The backs are in an I-formation. The quarterback play-fakes and takes a seven-step drop. The X-receiver runs a 9-route deep, the Z-receiver an 8-route to the post. Both safeties linger deep, so the quarterback looks off his primary receiver. As soon as his back foot plants on that final step, he resets and fires to the slot Y-receiver, who ran a abysmal comeback.

    Everything in the play I just described was invented by Sid Gillman or Don Coryell: the I-formation, the receiver route tree, precise quarterback drops, three-receiver sets, plumb concepts more refined than "let 'er rip" ... basically, the modern offensive principles that everyone from high school coaches to Madden gamers seize for granted. 

    Gillman began his NFL career with the Rams, concocting a Hollywood-worthy passing game for Norm Van Brocklin and receivers Tom Fears and Crazy Legs Hirsch. From there, it was on to the AFL, where the wide-open playing style allowed him to faultless his offensive philosophy.

    Meanwhile, Coryell (shown above) took the head coaching job at nearby San Diego state and began adjusting his patented I-formation into something more pass-oriented. The city of San Diego became a cauldron of recent football ideas. A immature Al Davis took a job as Gillman's assistant. A JUCO coach named John Madden began attending seminars where Coryell spoke.

    The leisure is not history; it's genealogy. Gillman's coaching tree begat Davis and the coaches he hired,  Chuck Noll, Dick Vermiel and others. Coryell begat Madden, Joe Gibbs and two generations of Super Bowl-caliber offensive coordinators (Ernie Zampese, Al Saunders, Mike Martz, Norv Turner, etc.) Bill Walsh spent a year learning Gillman's system from Davis, then slowly adapted it into the West Coast Offense.

    Without Gillman and Coryell, modern football might quiet watch relish that T-formation jalopy your Pop Warner coach made you run.

    As head coaches, Gillman won just one AFL title, while Coryell was always a playoff bridesmaid. It took their disciples to swirl their innovations into championships. But no list of Great coaches can live complete without the two men who sequenced the DNA of modern American football.

    Effective Requirements Practices: Defining the actual Customer Needs | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    This chapter provides specific recommendations to determine the actual requirements for a planned system.

    This chapter provides specific recommendations to determine the actual requirements for a planned system.

    Most any supplier that has designed, developed, and implemented a system for a buyer would avow that it had "performed extensive endeavor to define the actual customer needs." everybitof suppliers proceed to extensive efforts to meet the needs of buyers of systems. Why, then, this chapter?

    As discussed in Chapter 1, industry suffer indicates that systems provided by suppliers often accomplish not meet customer needs. In spite of extensive efforts, suppliers fail to measure up to expectations with the delivered systems.

    I distinguish between actual customer requirements and needs and stated requirements and needs. There is a huge disagreement between the two, and this disagreement accounts for many of their requirements-related problems. Historically, clients acquire not been able to articulate their actual customer requirements and needs. Accordingly, an efficacious requirements process must provide for the time, resources, mechanisms, methods, techniques, tools, and trained requirements engineers close with the application domain to define the actual customer requirements and needs.

    This problem is not limited to great systems. minute projects1 furthermore suffer the failure to identify the actual requirements. My suffer is that the practices presented in this reserve are applicable to projects of everybitof sizes.2 The differences are in the tailoring of the implementation approach. I provide some suggestions in the following chapters.

    Industry consultant Karl Wiegers expresses the problem this way:

    Requirements exist in the minds of users, visionaries, and developers, from which they must live gently extracted and massaged into a usable form. They exigency to live discovered with guidance from a talented requirements engineer who helps users understand what they really exigency to meet their industry needs and helps developers meet those needs. Few project roles are more difficult than that of the requirements engineer. Few are more critical.3

    This chapter provides several recommendations to facilitate getting to the actual requirements. Obviously, if we're not using a ground of the actual requirements to discharge their system evolution work, huge amounts of resources are being misspent. These recommendations will serve you to redirect these resources in ways that will produce better results.

    The following recommendations serve to warrant and discharge an improved approach and are discussed in swirl in the following subsections:

  • Invest 8% to 14% of total program costs on the requirements process. disburse additional time and endeavor near the genesis of a project to travail to identify the actual requirements. Ensure joint user and supplier responsibility for requirements. Facilitate clarification of the actual requirements. Control changes to requirements.

  • Train program and project managers (PMs) to pay more attention to the requirements process.

  • Identify a project champion. A project champion is an advocate for the effort, is very close with the set of actual customer needs for a system, and provides an active role in the evolution activities, facilitating the tasks of the evolution team.

  • Develop a definition of the project vision and scope.

  • Identify a requirements engineer and utilize domain experts to discharge requirements engineering tasks.

  • Train developers not to design requirements decisions and not to gold plate.

  • Utilize a variety of techniques to elicit user requirements and expectations. employ a common set of techniques and tools among everybitof parties involved in a particular project.

  • Train requirements engineers to write suitable requirements.

  • Document the rationale for each requirement.

  • Utilize methods and automated tools to analyze, prioritize, and track requirements.

  • Utilize peer reviews and inspections.

  • Consider the employ of formal methods when appropriate.

  • The quantity of high-level system requirements for a great system should live on the order of 50 to 200 requirements, not in the thousands (based on Ivy Hooks's suffer in supporting requirements efforts at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for several years). Requirements should live documented graphically and textually and should live made visible to everybitof stakeholders. One route to accomplish this is to invite stakeholders to participate in requirements reviews. A requirements review is a workshop involving the key stakeholders of a project for a short, intensive session that focuses on the definition or review of requirements for the project. Ideally, it is facilitated by an experienced outside facilitator or by a team member who can objectively process inputs and feedback.

    Let's review each of these recommendations in turn.

    Invest More in the Requirements Process

    Many people cerebrate of the requirements process as being primarily limited to requirements management, that is, tracking the status and change activity associated with requirements and tracing requirements to the various activities and products of the evolution effort. Projects expend an estimated 2% to 3% of total project costs on this activity.4It is advantageous to define the requirements process more broadly and to expend 8% to 14% of total program costs on it. Special stress should live placed on joint user and supplier responsibility for requirements, getting to the actual requirements, and controlling changes to requirements.

    We know from suffer that buyers most often provide suppliers of systems a definition of their requirements ("stated requirements"). This definition may live provided in the form of a statement of work, a Request for Proposal, a requirements document, a background description of a problem or need, and in other formats or combinations thereof. Buyers often acquire strong beliefs about their requirements documents and are strongly committed to their accuracy and validity. The reasons for this are simple to understand: Their customers acquire a lot of suffer in their travail and much expertise concerning it. They acquire spent a lot of time and money developing these artifacts. Often, the time spent in internal meetings discussing requirements and working out details about them clarifies, in the minds of the involved individuals, the specific details and characteristics. However, they note that almost always there are differences of opinion within a customer organization concerning notable aspects of some of these details. It may live that the person writing the requirements in the customer's organization is not the person who is the intended user. Also, suffer has shown that people with strong technical skills are not always efficacious communicators or writers.

    Perhaps a sound criticism of travail in their industry is that they often accept these artifacts as being complete and accurate and proceed with the stint of responding to these requirements—that is, of designing and developing an approach to meet the stated requirements.

    Experience suggests that they would live well advised to conduct partnering workshops and requirements reviews; to apply other mechanisms, methods, techniques, and tools; and to undertake a concerted endeavor in partnership with their customers to ascertain and evolve the actual requirements.5 A typical e-commerce application is required to live compatible with things that accomplish not yet exist, implying that developers must live able to irritated swap software.6

    Some data from industry suffer will clarify this point. It's preferable to utilize available data whenever workable to design decisions rather than to rely on intuition, experience, or the suggestions of others. They should "manage by fact." device 4-1 shows the outcome of investment in a requirements process on total program costs. These data were provided by Werner M. Gruehl, Chief, Cost & Economic Analysis Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration headquarters, and were reported by Ivy Hooks.7 Note that projects that spent less than 5% of total project or program costs on the requirements process experienced an 80% to 200% cost overrun, whereas those that invested 8% to 14% experienced less than a 60% overrun. These data provide a powerful message to PMs and requirements practitioners: An expenditure of 8% to 14% of total program costs on the requirements process results in the best outcomes as measured by total program costs.

    Figure 4-1 outcome of Requirements Process Investment on Program Costs

    Train PMs to Pay More Attention to the Requirements Process

    Hooks addresses another key issue in her paper "Why Don't Program and Project Managers (PMs) Pay More Attention to the Requirements and the Requirements Process?" From her 30 years of suffer in consulting concerning requirements, she concludes the following:

  • PMs assume that everyone knows how to write suitable requirements, thus the requirements process "will seize care of itself."

  • PMs watch to Come from a technical background and watch to focus on the nontechnical aspects of the program because these are recent and alien.

  • PMs know they accomplish not fully understand budgets, so more attention goes to budgets.

  • The PM's boss is focused on the budget, so the PM places more attention on what interests the boss.

  • This analysis is consistent with my experience. It is my heartfelt hope that one employ of this reserve will live to provide practitioners the suffer and data to embolden PMs to provide adequate funding for requirements-related activities and to pay close attention to the requirements and the requirements process.8 This is obviously an issue that needs to live addressed in corporate and organizational training programs for PMs.

    Steve McConnell9 advocates that technical managers should acquire tools for five kinds of work: estimating, planning, tracking, managing risk, and measuring. He furthermore observes that management skills acquire at least as much influence on evolution success as technical skills.

    Identify a Project Champion

    Among the industry experts in requirements engineering are Dean Leffingwell and Don Widrig of Rational Corporation. Their recent book, Managing Software Requirements, is highly recommended. It presents a very useful approach that is focused on utilizing trained teams to discharge systems evolution activities. Chapter 18 of Managing Software Requirements, The Champion, provides an excellent discussion of the exigency for and role of a champion. In their suffer during the past 20 years, a champion was identified in virtually every successful project in which they were involved.10Figure 4-2 summarizes this role.

    Figure 4-2

    Manage the elicitation process and become cozy when enough requirements are discovered.

  • Manage the conflicting inputs from everybitof stakeholders.

  • Make the trade-offs necessary to find the set of features that delivers the highest value to the greatest number of stakeholders.

  • Own the product vision.

  • Advocate for the product.

  • Negotiate with management, users, and developers.

  • Defend against feature creep.

  • Maintain a "healthy tension" between what the customer desires and what the evolution team can deliver in the release time frame.

  • Be the representative of the official channel between the customer and the evolution team.

  • Manage the expectations of customers, executive management, and the internal marketing and engineering departments.

  • Communicate the features of the release to everybitof stakeholders.

  • Review the software specifications to ensure that they conform to the staunch vision represented by the features.

  • Manage the changing priorities and the addition and deletion of features.

  • Define the Project Vision and Scope

    The project vision and scope document describes the background leading to the decision to develop a recent or modified system and provides a description of the system that will live extended by the travail of the project. (In Canada, the terms manifest and rules of date are used. Manifest is in used in location of the project charter or the project vision document. The rules of date are a description of the roles and responsibilities for project decision makers, including requirement prioritization and escalation procedures.) It is based on the industry requirements, and it specifies objectives and priorities. This facilitates a common understanding and communication of the scope of the system that is censorious for success. The executive sponsor of the project owns the document.

    Figure 4-3 provides a suggested table of contents for an operational concept definition (OCD) document, taken from J-STD-016, the successor standard to DoD-STD-2167A (1988) and MIL-STD-498 (1994). The thought is to create documentation that follows a similar format to facilitate gathering information concerning a planned evolution effort. Don't feel that you must address every topic in this template. Rather, tailor it for your project environment and needs. Note that the OCD (or whatever you elect to convene it) addresses

  • The scope of the planned endeavor by providing a system overview

  • Documents (references) that provide background and related information

  • The current system or situation; in other words, how the planned exigency is being met (or not) currently

  • The justification for the planned evolution effort. What is it that requires an investment in developing a recent system?

  • The concept or vision for a recent or modified system

  • Anticipated impacts of the recent system. How will having a recent system influence operations and the organization?

  • Advantages and limitations of the recent system and alternative approaches that were considered

  • Figure 4-3 Suggested Table of Contents for an OCD

    Operational Concept Description (OCD)


    1. Scope

    1.1 Identification

    1.2 System overview

    1.3 Document overview

    2. Referenced documents

    3. Current system or situation

    3.1 Background, objectives, and scope

    3.2 Operational policies and constraints

    3.3 Description of current system or situation

    3.4 Users or involved personnel

    3.5 champion strategy

    4. Justification for and nature of changes

    4.1 Justification for change

    4.2 Description of needed changes

    4.3 Priorities among the changes

    4.4 Changes considered but not included

    4.5 Assumptions and constraints

    5. Concept for a recent or modified system

    5.1 Background, objectives, and scope

    5.2 Operational policies and constraints

    5.3 Description of the recent or modified system

    5.4 Users/affected personnel

    5.5 champion strategy

    6. Operational scenarios

    7. Summary of impacts

    7.1 Operational impacts

    7.2 Organizational impacts

    7.3 Impacts during development

    8. Analysis of the proposed system

    8.1 Summary of advantages

    8.2 Summary of disadvantages/limitations

    8.3 Alternatives and trade-offs considered

    9. Notes

    A. Annexes

    1. Scope. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses:

    1.1 Identification. This subclause shall accommodate a plenary identification of the system to which this document applies, including, as applicable, identification number(s), title(s), abbreviations(s), version number(s), and release number(s).

    1.2 System overview. This subclause shall briefly state the purpose of the system to which this document applies. It shall record the common nature of the system; summarize the history of system development, operation, and maintenance; identify the project sponsor, acquirer, user, developer, and maintenance organizations; identify current and planned operating sites; and list other apropos documents.

    1.3 Document overview. This subclause shall summarize the purpose and contents of this document and shall record any security or privacy protection considerations associated with its use.

    2. Referenced documents. This clause shall list the number, title, revision, date, and source of everybitof documents referenced in this manual.

    3. Current system or situation. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses to record the system or situation as it currently exists.

    3.1 Background, objectives, and scope. This subclause shall record the background, mission or objectives, and scope of the current system or situation.

    3.2 Operational policies and constraints. This subclause shall record any operational policies and constraints that apply to the current system or situation.

    3.3 Description of current system or situation. This subclause shall provide a description of the current system or situation, identifying differences associated with different states or modes of operation (for example, regular, maintenance, training, degraded, emergency, alternative-site, wartime, peacetime). The distinction between states and modes is arbitrary. A system may live described in terms of states only, modes only, states within modes, modes within states, or any other scheme that is useful. If the system operates without states or modes, this subclause shall so state, without the exigency to create synthetic distinctions. The description shall include, as applicable:

    a. The operational environment and its characteristics

    b. Major system components and the interconnections among these components

    c. Interfaces to external systems or procedures

    d. Capabilities/functions of the current system

    e. Charts and accompanying descriptions depicting input, output, data flow, and manual and automated processes enough to understand the current system or situation from the user's point of view

    f. Performance characteristics, such as speed, throughput, volume, frequency

    g. Quality attributes, such as reliability, maintainability, availability, flexibility, portability, usability, efficiency

    h. Provisions for safety, security, privacy protection, and continuity of operations in emergencies

    3.4 Users or involved personnel. This subclause shall record the types of users of the system, or personnel involved in the current situation, including, as applicable, organizational structures, training/skills, responsibilities, activities, and interactions with one another.

    3.5 Support strategy. This subclause shall provide an overview of the champion strategy for the current system, including, as applicable to this document, maintenance organization(s); facilities; equipment; maintenance software; repair/replacement criteria; maintenance levels and cycles; and storage, distribution, and supply methods.

    4. Justification for and nature of changes. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses:

    4.1 Justification for change. This subclause shall

    a. Describe recent or modified aspects of user needs, threats, missions, objectives, environment, interfaces, personnel, or other factors that require a recent or modified system

    b. Summarize deficiencies or limitations in the current system or situation that design it unable to respond to these factors

    4.2 Description of needed changes. This subclause shall summarize recent or modified capabilities/functions, processes, interfaces, or other changes needed to respond to the factors identified in 4.1.

    4.3 Priorities among the changes. This subclause shall identify priorities among the needed changes. It shall, for example, identify each change as essential, desirable, or optional, and prioritize the desirable and optional changes.

    4.4 Changes considered but not included. This subclause shall identify changes considered but not included in 4.2, and rationale for not including them.

    4.5 Assumptions and constraints. This subclause shall identify any assumptions and constraints applicable to the changes identified in this clause.

    5. Concept for a recent or modified system. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses to record a recent or modified system:

    5.1 Background, objectives, and scope. This subclause shall record the background, mission or objectives, and scope of the recent or modified system.

    5.2 Operational policies and constraints. This subclause shall record any operational policies and constraints that apply to the recent or modified system.

    5.3 Description of the recent or modified system. This subclause shall provide a description of the recent or modified system, identifying differences associated with different states or modes of operation (for example, regular, maintenance, training, degraded, emergency, alternative-site, wartime, peacetime). The distinction between states and modes is arbitrary. A system may live described in terms of states only, modes only, states within modes, modes within states, or any other scheme that is useful. If the system operates without states or modes, this subclause shall so state, without the exigency to create synthetic distinctions. The description shall include, as applicable:

    a. The operational environment and its characteristics

    b. Major system components and the interconnections among these components

    c. Interfaces to external systems or procedures

    d. Capabilities/functions of the recent or modified system

    e. Charts and accompanying descriptions depicting input, output, data flow, and manual and automated processes enough to understand the recent or modified system or situation from the user's point of view

    f. Performance characteristics, such as speed, throughput, volume, frequency

    g. Quality attributes, such as reliability, maintainability, availability, flexibility, portability, usability, efficiency

    h. Provisions for safety, security, privacy protection, and continuity of operations in emergencies

    5.4 Users/affected personnel. This subclause shall record the types of users of the recent or modified system, including, as applicable, organizational structures, training/skills, responsibilities, and interactions with one another.

    5.5 Support strategy. This subclause shall provide an overview of the champion strategy for the recent or modified system, including, as applicable, maintenance organization(s); facilities; equipment; maintenance software; repair/replacement criteria; maintenance levels and cycles; and storage, distribution, and supply methods.

    6. Operational scenarios. This clause shall record one or more operational scenarios that illustrate the role of the recent or modified system, its interaction with users, its interface to other systems, and everybitof states or modes identified for the system. The scenarios shall involve events, actions, stimuli, information, interactions, etc., as applicable. References may live made to other media, such as videos, to provide fragment or everybitof of this information.

    7. Summary of impacts. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses:

    7.1 Operational impacts. This subclause shall record anticipated operational impacts on the user, acquirer, developer, and maintenance organizations. These impacts may involve changes in interfaces with computer operating centers; change in procedures; employ of recent data sources; changes in quantity, type, and timing of data to live input to the system; changes in data retention requirements; and recent modes of operation based on peacetime, alert, wartime, or emergency conditions.

    7.2 Organizational impacts. This subclause shall record anticipated organizational impacts on the user, acquirer, developer, and maintenance organizations. These impacts may involve modification of responsibilities; addition or elimination of responsibilities or positions; exigency for training or retraining; and changes in number, skill levels, position identifiers, or location of personnel in various modes of operation.

    7.3 Impacts during development. This subclause shall record anticipated impacts on the user, acquirer, developer, and maintenance organizations during the evolution effort. These impacts may involve meetings/discussions regarding the recent system; evolution or modification of databases; training; parallel operation of the recent and existing systems; impacts during testing of the recent system; and other activities needed to aid or monitor development.

    8. Analysis of the proposed system. This clause should live divided into the following subclauses:

    8.1 Summary of advantages. This subclause shall provide a qualitative and quantitative summary of the advantages to live obtained from the recent or modified system. This summary shall involve recent capabilities, enhanced capabilities, and improved performance, as applicable, and their relationship to deficiencies identified in 4.1.

    8.2 Summary of disadvantages/limitations. This subclause shall provide a qualitative and quantitative summary of disadvantages or limitations of the recent or modified system. These disadvantages and limitations shall include, as applicable, degraded or missing capabilities, degraded or less-than-desired performance, greater-than-desired employ of computer hardware resources, undesirable operational impacts, conflicts with user assumptions, and other constraints.

    8.3 Alternatives and trade-offs considered. This subclause shall identify and record major alternatives considered to the system or its characteristics, the trade-offs among them, and rationale for the decisions reached.

    9. Notes. This clause shall accommodate any common information that aids in understanding this document (e.g., background information, glossary, rationale). This clause shall involve an alpabetical listing of everybitof acronyms, abbreviations, and their meanings as used in this document and a list of any terms and definitions needed to understand this document.

    A. Annexes. Annexes may live used to provide information published separately for convenience in document maintenance (e.g., charts, classified data). As applicable, each annex shall live referenced in the main body of the document where the data would normally acquire been provided. Annexes may live bound as part documents for ease in handling. Annexes shall live lettered alphabetically (A, B, etc.).

    Other excellent references that provide guidance for this travail involve books by Leffingwell and Widrig11 and by Wiegers.12Figure 4-4 is a template for a vision and scope document provided by Wiegers. This template is simpler than the DoD standard and may live enough for your needs.

    Figure 4-4 Template for a Vision and Scope Document

    1. industry Requirements

    1.1 Background

    1.2 industry Opportunity

    1.3 industry Objectives

    1.4 Customer or Market Requirements

    1.5 Value Provided to Customers

    1.6 industry Risks

    2. Vision of the Solution

    2.1 Vision Statement

    2.2 Major Features

    2.3 Assumptions and Dependencies

    3. Scope and Limitations

    3.1 Scope of Initial Release

    3.2 Scope of Subsequent Releases

    3.3 Limitations and Exclusions

    4. industry Context

    4.1 Customer Profiles

    4.2 Project Priorities

    5. Product Success Factors

    Identify a Requirements Engineer and Utilize Domain Experts to discharge Requirements Engineering Tasks

    My suffer is that a project of any size requires an individual assigned as the requirements engineer. Depending on the size of the project, this may live a part-time assignment or may require the full-time endeavor of several people. It's valuable for those assigned in this role to acquire had extensive suffer and expertise in the functional belt being addressed by the planned system (domain experts or subject matter experts [SMEs]). The judgement for utilizing domain experts as requirements engineers is that the requirements exigency to live understood in the customer's context. This is an extremely notable issue. Unfortunately, many projects cripple their requirements efforts by not providing domain experts. This is a erroneous economy. It may live that a project can acquire the domain expert assume the role of the project champion.

    SMEs can live found by recruiting experienced developers from other projects within your organization. Another source is professional staff departing customer organizations for reasons of retirement or a wish for a recent opportunity. SMEs duty as a censorious fragment of the team by understanding and explaining the context of the requirements for the planned system.13 SMEs can determine, based on their experience, whether the requirements are reasonable, how they extend the existing system, how the proposed architecture should live designed, and the impacts on users, among other areas. This approach enables the requirements engineering tasks to live performed more effectively.

    A pitfall for which to watch is an SME whose approach is inflexible. An SME who can assist most effectively is one who is open to recent ideas, approaches, and technologies.

    Train Developers Not to design Requirements Decisions and Not to Gold Plate

    On a minute project, the requirements engineer may furthermore live a programmer (developer). On larger projects, they typically acquire individuals assigned in the developer role. Developers often find themselves in the situation of being required to design and code capabilities for systems when the requirements are not well defined (look ahead to device 4-9 for the criteria for a suitable requirement). Faced with this decision, the easier action is to design some assumptions and maintain working, particularly in the physiognomy of tight deadlines and unpaid overtime. A better preference would live to interrupt travail and amass the requirement clarified. Developers exigency to live trained that this preference is best (and expected). Such "training" needs to live conveyed with suitable judgment so that technical performers accomplish not feel that they are being overly constrained. Developers who are accustomed to an undisciplined environment may seize exception to having to conform to rules. A related problem is a developer who adds features and capabilities that are not required by the specification (gold plating). This may live done because the developer sincerely believes it is confiscate and "best" for everybitof concerned. However, gold plating adds to costs and extends the schedule and may complicate other areas of the system. If a user noticed this feature or capability in one belt of the system, he might determine that it should live provided throughout the system! This contributes to requirements creep and results in added costs.

    Utilize a Variety of Techniques to Elicit Customer and User Requirements and Expectations

    There is extensive information available in the system and software engineering literature concerning requirements elicitation—that is, the endeavor undertaken by systems and software requirements engineers to understand customer needs and expectations.14

    Leffingwell and Widrig15 provide an insightful discussion of useful techniques and tools to elicit user requirements and expectations in their book. These techniques and tools involve interviewing, questionnaires, requirements workshops, brainstorming and thought reduction, storyboards, employ cases, role playing, and prototyping.16

    Requirements checklists provide a route to evaluate the content, completeness, and attribute of the requirements prior to development. McConnell17 provides a suitable checklist in Code Complete, and Wiegers18 provides another for inspection of software requirements specifications at his Web site. If the requirements are explicit, the users can review them and correspond to them. If they're not, the developers will intermission up making requirements decisions during coding, a sure-fire recipe for problems, as discussed earlier. Weinberg, in The Secrets of Consulting, provides helpful advice concerning giving and getting advice successfully.

    Use Cases

    One requirements technique is the employ case. Schneider and Winters19 provide a practical approach. survey device 4-5 for an case of a employ case diagram utilizing the Unified Modeling Language (UML) notation. UML is a graphical language for visualizing, specifying, constructing, and documenting the artifacts of a software-intensive system that was adopted by the kick Management Group in late 1997. UML has become a vendor-independent standard for expressing the design of software systems and is being rapidly adopted throughout industry. UML incorporates employ cases as the standard means of capturing and representing requirements.

    Figure 4-5 case of a employ Case Diagram

    Many developers believe that employ cases and scenarios facilitate team communication. They provide a context for the requirements by expressing sequences of events and a common language for intermission users and the technical team. They identify system interfaces, enable modeling the system graphically and textually, and are reusable in test and user documentation. Rumbaugh20 furthermore provides a helpful approach in "Getting Started: Using employ Cases to Capture Requirements." Leffingwell and Widrig21 provide checklists concerning employ cases. Eman Nasr22 has provided an easy-to-understand basic introduction in his employ Case Technique for Requirements Engineering. Wiegers's23 view is that employ cases lonesome often don't provide enough detail for developers to know just what to build.

    Consideration should live given to using employ cases to record the outwardly visible requirements of a system.24 employ cases allow analysts to identify the required features of a system. They record the things users of a system want the system to accomplish (sometimes referred to as scenarios). employ cases are especially helpful for processes that are iterative and risk driven (which helps identify and address risks early in the program). The high-level employ cases should live developed to serve determine the scope of the project. What should live included? What can they realistically accomplish given their schedule and budget?25 The developed employ cases can furthermore live utilized as test cases.

    As with any method, there are both advantages and disadvantages of using employ cases as a method. Among the advantages is that because of the thread of behavior characteristics and the fact that UML includes inevitable specialized modeling elements and notations (for example, "use case realization"), employ cases provide additional value to their role of linking the requirements activities to design and implementation. Among the disadvantages is that employ cases are not suitable containers for nonfunctional requirements (such as the-ilities and attributes of the system environment) and design constraints. Dean Leffingwell's book, Managing Software Requirements, recommends alternative approaches based on the suffer of the project team. In the situation in which the team's suffer with the requirements process is limited and the object-oriented (OO) paradigm has not been adopted and used, a conventional software requirements specification approach is recommended.26 If the team's suffer with the requirements process is limited but the team is in the process of adopting the OO paradigm, the recommendation is to travail with the employ case system but to master it fully before depending on it to portray the requirements.

    As celebrated earlier, the developed employ cases can furthermore live utilized as test cases. Bob Poston, Director of attribute Assurance Technology at Aonix, Inc., advocates front-end testing or specification testing to achieve defect prevention in a requirements process.27 Poston asserts that project time and resources allocated to testing (typically 30% or more28) can live dramatically reduced, and he recommends adding formality to the requirements phase using a requirements modeling tool and employ case notation and scenarios. Provide system-level employ cases and then object-level employ cases for the design. Add enough information to the employ case to design it test ready. Poston notes (based on data from Capers Jones) that typically 16% of the test cases are redundant and 10% are irrelevant; therefore, in a typical project, 26% of the test endeavor is wasted. They exigency to develop requirements specifications that acquire in them the data that allow primary specification based test design. Poston cited two examples in his presentation, one in which the defect signify dropped 94%29 and another in which productivity increased 100 fold from 100 test cases in 20 days to 1,000 test cases in 2 days.30

    In summary, my suffer is that employ of a common set of techniques and tools among everybitof parties involved in a particular project is a much bigger serve than one would imagine, because this enables the entire evolution team to share the very concepts and language. This is more easily recommended than accomplished, however. Each system and software engineer has her/his own suffer and familiarity with a set of tools. It's human nature to relish to employ that with which each of us is most familiar. Getting consensus on the employ of a specific set of methods and tools is difficult, and providing the training and the occasion to employ them and become very close with their capabilities is expensive and time-consuming. (Also, recall the comments I provided at the intermission of Chapter 1 concerning systems and software engineers and the recommended context for readers of this book.)

    Train Requirements Engineers to Write suitable Requirements

    There is strong evidence of the value of utilizing trained requirements engineers. Trained requirements engineers correlate with

  • Well-written, unambiguous requirements statements

  • The ability to utilize an efficacious automated requirements tool

  • More efficacious employ of project resources because of reduced rework

  • The repercussion of Requirements Errors

    Industry research shows that requirements errors are both the most common and furthermore the most expensive defects in the technical work. device 4-6 quantifies the typical types of requirements errors.

    Figure 4-6 Types of Nonclerical Requirements Errors

    Hooks and Farry31 report that more than 80% of everybitof product defects are inserted in the requirements definition stage of product development. This means that they can redeem money! If they provide suitable requirements, they can eliminate 80% of the rework problems. Rework costs are estimated at 45% of total project costs.32Thus, by taking 80% of 45%, they learn that 36% (more than one third) of total project costs (based on industry data) potentially can live avoided by driving requirements errors out of the travail products. I'll acknowledge that it would live difficult to achieve this amount of savings. However, clearly a significant portion of this consume should live redirected by any and every evolution endeavor through employ of the practices recommended in this reserve and other process improvements. From the perspective of the PM, the savings achieved by employing efficacious requirements practices should live redirected to pay for the needed endeavor and any associated training, methods, techniques, and tools required.

    The importance of Requirements to Program Costs

    Managers would live well advised to seize careful note of the relative cost to fix an error. Barry Boehm33 analyzed 63 software evolution projects in corporations such as IBM, GTE, and TRW and determined the ranges in cost for the oversight types described earlier that were created by erroneous assumptions in the requirements phase but not detected until later phases (Figure 4-7).

    Figure 4-7 Relative Cost to Fix an Error

    Phase in Which the oversight Is Found

    Cost Ratio







    Development Testing


    Acceptance Testing




    Figure 4-8 shows the value of investing in an efficacious requirements process in which the actual requirements are identified and in which requirements errors are driven out of the requirements travail products during the earliest workable phase of system development. The cost to repair a requirements defect costs more the later in the project life cycle the oversight is discovered. For example, it costs 15 to 40 times as much to correct a requirements oversight during evolution testing than if they resolve the oversight earlier. This is a very strong dispute for investing more in the requirements process.

    Figure 4-8 Relative Cost to Fix Requirements Defects When Discovered in Later Stages

    What Is a suitable Requirement?

    There are several suitable articles and white papers on what is considered a suitable requirement.34Figure 4-9 presents a summary checklist of the criteria for a suitable requirement, providing criteria and a description of each.

    Figure 4-9 Criteria of a suitable Requirement




    Can the system meet prioritized, actual needs without it? If yes, the requirementisn't necessary.


    Can one ensure that the requirement is met in the system? If not, the requirementshould live removed or revised. Note: The verification system and even at which the requirement can live verified should live determined explicitly as fragment of the evolution for each of the requirements. (The verification even is the location in the system where the requirement is met (for example, the "system level," the "segment level," and the "subsystem level).35


    Can the requirement live met in the system under development?


    Can the requirement live interpreted in more than one way? If yes, the require-ment should live clarified or removed. obscure or poorly worded writing can lead to solemn misunderstandings and needless rework. Note: Specifications should involve a list of acronyms and a glossary of terms to improve clarity.


    Are everybitof conditions under which the requirement applies stated? Also, does the specification document everybitof known requirements? (Requirements are typically classified as functional, performance, interface, constraints, and environment.)


    Can the requirement live met without conflicting with everybitof other requirements? If not, the requirement should live revised or removed.


    Is the source (source) of the requirement known, and can the requirement live referenced (located) throughout the system? The automated requirements tool should enable finding the location in the system where each requirement is met.


    Can the requirement live allocated to an constituent of the system design where it can live implemented? If not, the requirement needs to live revised or eliminated.36


    Is the requirement stated simply and clearly?

    Implementation free

    The requirement should state what must live done without indicating how. The treatment of interface requirements is generally an exception.

    Standard constructs

    Requirements are stated as imperative needs using "shall." Statements indicating "goals"or using the word "will" are not imperatives.

    Unique identifier

    Each requirement should acquire a unique identifying number that assists inidentification, maintaining change history, and providing traceability.

    A "good" requirement is not necessarily a "real" requirement. The requirement may meet their criteria for a suitable requirement, but the requirement may not meet a actual exigency of the users of the planned system. They ascertain the actual requirements by following the recommendations provided in this chapter.

    Oliver and colleagues37 provide a suitable requirements taxonomy and believe that the engineering endeavor and costs associated with assessing requirements can live reduced substantially with modeling.

    Document the Rationale for Each Requirement

    Industry sources attest that by taking the endeavor to document why each requirement is needed, as many as half of the "requirements" can live eliminated. The documentation step reduces the life cycle cost of system evolution significantly by obviating the exigency for follow-on travail for unnecessary requirements. The rationale describes some or everybitof of the following related information:38

    An case of documenting the rationale for a requirement is the following: Requirement 101 is needed in the system to enable the users of the system to receive feedback that their request was transmitted. In documenting the rationale for requirements, the requirements engineer may

  • Gather data to enable a projection of how the activity involved may vary depending on different circumstances and uses of the system

  • Perform a trade study to determine alternative ways to address the requirement

  • Consider alternatives and provide the basis for the selected alternative

  • The easiest route to capture rationale is as each requirement is written. No requirement should live location into the specification until its rationale is well understood.

    Utilize Methods and Automated Tools to Analyze, Prioritize, and Track Requirements

    As suggested previously, the broader term requirements process involves many aspects of the project throughout its entire life cycle, not just "requirements management." However, the automated tools available today are often described as requirements management tools. survey device 4-10 for a list of several of the available tools and their related Web sites. Note that the International Council on Systems Engineering's Tools Working Group provides information concerning a great set of tools at its Web site, Many projects acquire been supported by office automation tools such as Microsoft Word or Microsoft excel and database applications such as Informix to manage requirements, but these tools are relatively limited in their capabilities (although they can provide some of the capabilities needed for a particular project). Many organizations acquire developed their own requirements tools (some acquire developed several), but this approach is not cost-effective, given the tools available on the market today.

    Figure 4-10 Commercial Requirements Tools, Vendors, and Web Sites



    Web Site

    Caliber RM

    Technology Builders, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

    C.A.R.E. 2.0

    SOPHIST Group, Nuremberg, Germany


    VITECH Corporation, Vienna, Virginia


    Telelogic, Malmo, Sweden


    Holagent Corporation, Gilroy, California

    Requisite Pro (ReqPro)

    Rational Software Corporation, Lexington, Massachusetts

    RTM Workshop

    Integrated Chipware, Inc., Reston, Virginia


    TD Technologies, Richardson, Texas


    CMD Corporation, Dallas, Texas

    Vital Link

    Compliance Automation, Inc., Boerne, Texas

    Xtie-RT Requirements Tracer

    Teledyne Brown Engineering, Los Angeles, California

    A sophisticated requirements tool is able to accomplish much more than requirements management. It should live able to facilitate requirements elicitation, serve with prioritization of requirements, provide traceability39 of requirements throughout the evolution endeavor (to design, implementation, and test verification, for example) and allow for assignment of requirements to subsequent releases of system products. It should allow assignment of an unlimited number of attributes (characteristics of requirements) to any and everybitof requirements. survey device 4-11 for a sample requirements matrix that shows attributes. Attributes allow users to associate data with objects, table markers, table cells, modules, and projects. For example, there are two kinds of attributes in DOORS, user-defined attributes and system-defined attributes. User-defined attributes may live built from specific ascribe types such as text, integer, date, and so forth and are instantiated by users for their own needs. System-defined attributes, however, are predefined by DOORS and automatically record essential and highly useful information in the background. Attributes allow you to associate information with individual or related groups of requirements and often facilitate analysis of requirements data via filtering and sorting based on ascribe values. System-defined attributes may furthermore live used for filtering and sorting. Although they are, for the most part, read-only and are not user modifiable, they discharge essential and automatic information gathering.

    Figure 4-11 Sample Requirements ascribe Matrix

    Approaches, Tools, and Methods for Prioritizing Requirements

    It's notable to live able to prioritize the system and software requirements. An excellent discussion of this topic is provided by Karl Wiegers.40 He suggests two scales, each with three-levels: (1) high/medium/low and (2) essential/conditional/ optional. One can visualize how utilizing these scales at an confiscate even of abstraction (for example, the employ case level, the feature level, or the functional requirement level) will facilitate dealing with the common problem of having a limited evolution budget for release 1.0! Wiegers discusses his semiquantitative analytical approach and provides an case for a sample project: "Any actions they seize to scurry requirements prioritization from the political arena into an objective and analytical one will improve the project's ability to deliver the most notable functionality in the most confiscate order" (p. 30). This is recommended reading for managers and requirements practitioners. Wiegers provides a set of useful tools at his Web site, including a Microsoft excel requirements prioritization spreadsheet.41

    Another system for prioritizing requirements was developed by Karlsson and Ryan.42 Their concern was that there are usually more requirements than can live implemented given stakeholders' time and resource constraints (sound familiar?). They sought a route to select a subset of the customers' requirements and quiet produce a system that met their needs. The process they developed is described well in the referenced article. It has been applied successfully to two commercial projects, and these are furthermore described. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to compare requirements pairwise according to their relative value and cost. The approach is considered simple, fast, and accurate and yields accurate results and holds stakeholder satisfaction as both the ultimate goal and the guiding theme. Stakeholder satisfaction addresses maximum quality, minimum costs, and short time-to-market. Karlsson and Ryan believe that this cost-value approach is a useful first step in addressing a criticism of software engineering for lacking the trade-off analysis that is a component of multidisciplinary systems engineering. They feel that this approach is similar to that of the attribute ascribe Requirements and fight Consultant tool within Barry Boehm's WinWin system.43

    Boehm has continued to evolve the WinWin Spiral Model to develop system and software requirements and architectural solutions based on winning conditions negotiated among a project's stakeholders.44 The WinWin negotiation tool is a UNIX workstation-based groupware champion system that allows stakeholders to enter winning conditions, explore their interactions, and negotiate mutual agreements on the specifics of the project. The model and champion system feature a central role for quantitative trade-off analysis tools such as COCOMO. This system is obviously more complicated than the other two, but the research is a promising effort. Many publications are available at the Web site concerning the win-win approach.

    These methods for prioritizing requirements present a significant occasion to strengthen and improve your requirements process further. survey the discussion of the rationale for prioritizing requirements in Chapter 8. everybitof requirements are not equal—some are more notable to customers and users than others. It is the job of the system developers (the requirements engineers, specifically) in concert with the customer to device out how to prioritize the requirements and how to size the evolution endeavor to meet the project budget and schedule. The suitable advice is that proven methods are available to help. The challenge is to employ them.

    Collect Requirements from Multiple Viewpoints

    From their experience, they know that information about the requirements for the planned system needs to live elicited from a variety of stakeholder perspectives. Sommerville and Sawyer45 acquire provided a suitable discussion of this topic in their reserve Requirements Engineering: A suitable drill Guide. In Chapter 13 they record the basic principle underlying various viewpoints. They recommend a systematic approach called PREview (which stands for process and requirements engineering viewpoints), developed from suffer with great systems engineering projects. device 4-12 provides an overview of how PREview checklists and tables are used when iterating requirements elicitation/discovery, requirements analysis, and requirements negotiation.

    Figure 4-12 The PREview Process

    Viewpoint-oriented analysis is obviously more expensive than an unstructured, informal approach to requirements elicitation. However, it may prove to live a suitable investment. As with any process improvement, an organization may want to "pilot" it, using a relatively minute project. As celebrated in a recent article by Sommerville and colleagues,46 they believe PREview helps improve the attribute of requirements specification by providing a framework for analysis based on the key industry concerns that define the success or failure of a project. PREview does not define how priorities, inconsistencies, and redundancies are resolved. This is the stint of the joint team.

    Consider the employ of Formal Methods When Appropriate

    A formal system in software evolution is a system that provides a formal language for describing a software artifact such as a specification, design, or source code. Formal proofs are possible, in principle, about properties of the artifact so expressed. Vienneau47 recommends using formal methods to serve adequately capture requirements and cautions that many software engineers acquire adopted recent methodologies without understanding the root concepts. He believes formal methods swear to bow benefits in attribute and productivity. He notes that formal methods are typically used in organizations at SW-CMM even 3 and above and asserts that an organization that can device out how to integrate formal methods effectively into their current process will live able to gain a competitive advantage.

  • There is no industry agreement on the definition of a "small project." One could consider it a "team." Often it is considered a project involving one to six professionals operating for as long as three to six months, but this definition is arbitrary. Consideration has been given in the industry literature to whether "small projects" are really everybitof that different from "medium-size" or even "large" projects. survey impress Paulk, Using the Software CMM with Judgment: minute Projects & minute Organizations; Rita Hadden, Now What accomplish They Do?; and Louise Williams, SPI Best Practices for minute Projects. Members of minute projects should live encouraged to seize what they can from the experiences of larger projects by tailoring the approach, rather than using smallness as an excuse for not taking edge of industry lessons. For a perspective giving careful attention and focus to "smallness," survey Brodman and Johnson, The LOGOS Tailored CMM for minute Businesses, minute Organizations, and minute Projects. The changes tailor the Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW-CMM) for a minute project environment. Participants in minute projects or organizations may find this reference helpful.
  • Rita Hadden's view based on observations and suffer with more than 50 minute projects is that professional judgment can live used to scale down and apply key practices appropriately to achieve positive outcomes for minute projects. survey "How Scalable Are CMM Key Practices?"
  • Karl Wiegers, "Habits of efficacious Analysts," p. 65.
  • Rob Sabourin notes from his extensive consulting travail that it is astonishing how many organizations and companies accomplish not acquire any requirements process (comment included in Sabourin's review of this manuscript).
  • Goguen regards requirements as "emergent, in the sense that they accomplish not already exist, but rather emerge [emphasis added] from interactions between the analyst and the client organization." This is useful because conventional methods of requirements elicitation often assume that users know (1) exactly what they want from a future system and (2) how this system, once implemented, will influence the route they work. Common sense tells us these are not known in the early stages of any effort. survey Jirotka and Goguen, Requirements Engineering: convivial and Technical Issues, p. 194.
  • Hot swap is a term taken from the hardware world. It means one can seize out a board or component while the system is running and supersede it with a recent one without shutting down the system. For e-commerce systems they often employ multiple servlets/server applications. To "hot swap" is to supersede one of them without shutting down the e-commerce site and without losing a transaction. Some software engineering applications should ensure that components are designed to permit "hot swapping." This allows for reaction to recent and evolving requirements without shutting down a system.
  • Hooks, Managing Requirements, pp. 1–2.
  • SECAT LLC publishes a set of four pocket guides, each designed for a person with specific job responsibilities: the PM, an organizational leader, a system engineer, and one who facilitates performing microassessments (measuring projects against a framework). Each pocket pilot provides a progression of questions designed to serve maintain the project on track. A scorecard is provided for each pocket pilot to facilitate the tracking progress of improvement activities. The questions in the pocket guides are a distillation of the practices found in the Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model (SE-CMM), an industry framework for systems engineering improvement and measurement. survey; e-mail,
  • "The Software Manager's Toolkit," IEEE Software.
  • Leffingwell and Widrig, Managing Software Requirements, p. 179.
  • Leffingwell and Widrig, Managing Software Requirements, pp. 187–222.
  • Wiegers, Software Requirements, pp. 95–108.
  • Sabourin notes that it is very difficult in some domains to locate lore experts who are able to express requirements clearly. In these situations, a role of the requirements engineer is to map domain expert input to pellucid requirements. (Comment included in Sabourin's review of this manuscript.)
  • See Sommerville and Sawyer, Requirements Engineering: A suitable drill Guide. Another source is Gause and Weinberg's Exploring Requirements: attribute Before Design, which provides a thorough discussion of the issues related to elicitation of user needs from customers and users.
  • See Leffingwell and Widrig, Managing Software Requirements, Chapters 7 through 15, which provide guidelines for understanding user needs.
  • See Connell and Shafer, Structured Rapid Prototyping, for a discussion of the benefits of rapid prototyping, tools, and techniques that can live used, and other practical aspects of pile prototypes and evolving them into production systems. survey furthermore Kaplan et al., Secrets of Software Quality, pp. 265–269.
  • McConnell, Code Complete, pp. 32–34.
  • Available at
  • Geri Schneider and Jason P. Winters, Applying employ Cases: A Practical Guide.
  • James Rumbaugh, "Getting Started: Using employ Cases to Capture Requirements." Journal of Object-Oriented Programming.
  • Managing Software Requirements, pp. 289–292.
  • Nasr is associated with the Computer Science Department, University of York, in the United Kingdom. E-mail:
  • Karl Wiegers, "10 Requirements Traps to Avoid." Software Testing and attribute Engineering Magazine. In addition to describing ten notable requirements traps, Wiegers provides keys to excellent requirements, including a collaborative customer-developer partnership for requirements evolution and management, and prioritizing requirements.
  • Another suitable reference is by Daryl Kulak and Eamonn Guiney, employ Cases: Requirements in Context, which explains and provides examples of the nine diagrams of the UML (use case diagram, sequence diagram, collaboration diagram, statechart diagram, activity diagram, class diagram, kick diagram, component diagram, and deployment diagram). They furthermore provide a comprehensive and solicitous list of problems related to using employ cases (pp. 154–165). survey furthermore Korson, The Misuse of employ Cases. Korson notes that projects can expend a lot of time and endeavor on employ cases without much capitalize when they are not used correctly. Root causes of the misuse of employ cases are (1) a requirements process that is neither understood nor properly managed, (2) poor-quality requirements, and (3) poor-quality designs. Analysts sometimes neglect fundamental principles of requirements gathering in the name of employ cases.
  • A reference point based on industry data is that systems and software projects are overpromised by an indifferent of 100% to 200% (The Standish Group, 8,000 projects, 1996).
  • See the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' (IEEE) standard 830, IEEE Recommended drill for Requirements Specifications.
  • See his presentation from the National SEPG99 Conference, Generating Test Cases from employ Cases Automatically, March 1999.
  • Capers Jones, Software Quality: Analysis and Guidelines for Success, p. xxiv. Watts Humphrey's suffer is that testing typically removes only 50% of the errors present. You must acquire attribute code going into testing to acquire attribute code coming out (personal e-mail communication with Humphrey, April 17, 2000).
  • Robert M. Poston. "Counting Down to Zero Software Failures," p. 230.
  • Richard Adhikari, "Development Process Is a Mixed-Bag Effort."
  • Customer-Centered Products, p. 3.
  • Leffingwell, "Calculating Your recur Investment from More efficacious Requirements Management," p. 3. Available at Rational Corporation. Available at
  • See Barry W. Boehm, Software Engineering Economics. These figures actually may live conservative because Boehm studied only those projects that were completed. survey Gause and Weinberg, Exploring Requirements: attribute Before Design, for a discussion of the cost of ambiguity and how to remove it (pp. 17–21).
  • See the Compliance Automation Web site at to access excellent papers concerning requirements. Several are required reading for anyone seriously involved with requirements: pilot for Managing and Writing Requirements, which is a thorough treatment; Writing suitable Requirements, which provides helpful hints to avoid many of the most common requirements writing problems; Characteristics of suitable Requirements, which describes major characteristics of well-defined requirements, and Managing Requirements, which provides notable insights into the requirements process. The greeting at this Web site reflects the wisdom of extensive experience: "People who write atrocious requirements should not live surprised when they amass atrocious products, but they always are!"
  • See Grady, System Validation and Verification, pp. 101–102, for a discussion of verification levels.
  • The alternative is to risk a major costly change in the system or software architecture.
  • Oliver et al., Engineering complicated Systems with Models and Objects, pp. 104–115. VITECH's automated tool, CORE, has behavioral modeling capabilities. survey
  • Ivy Hooks, pilot for Managing and Writing Requirements, p. 5–4. survey pp. 5–4 through 5–6 for a more extensive discussion of why the documentation step is censorious and how to accomplish it.
  • Traceability gives essential assistance in understanding the relationships that exist within and across software requirements, design, and implementation, and it is censorious to the evolution process. survey James D. Palmer, "Traceability." survey furthermore the definition and guidelines for requirements traceability in device 9-5.
  • Karl Wiegers, "First Things First: Prioritizing Requirements," pp. 24–30.
  • Available at
  • Joachim Karlsson and Kevin Ryan, "A Cost-Value Approach for Prioritizing Requirements," pp. 67–74.
  • See Boehm and H. In, "Identifying Quality-Requirements Conflicts," pp. 25–35.
  • Available at
  • See pp. 90–93 and 359–388. survey furthermore the Web site for this book,
  • Sommerville et al., "Viewpoints for Requirements Elicitation: A Practical Approach."
  • Vienneau, "A Review of Formal Methods." The discipline of a formal specification can result in fewer specification errors. Using specifications written in a formal language to complement natural language descriptions can design the compress between a user and a developer more precise.

  • Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : : :

    Back to Main Page
    About Killexams exam dumps | |