Pass4sure HP0-J39 dumps | HP0-J39 existent questions |

HP0-J39 Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions

Study lead Prepared by HP Dumps Experts HP0-J39 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with lofty Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

HP0-J39 exam Dumps Source : Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions

Test Code : HP0-J39
Test title : Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions
Vendor title : HP
exam questions : 145 existent Questions

Use existent HP0-J39 dumps with wholehearted high-quality and recognition.
I almost misplaced recall in me inside the wake of falling flat the HP0-J39 exam.I scored 87% and cleared this exam. A deal obliged for convalescing my actuality. Subjects in HP0-J39 had been definitely difficult for me to accumulate it. I almost surrendered the contrivance to pick this exam over again. Besides because of my companion who prescribed me to utilize Questions & answers. Internal a compass of smooth four weeks i was honestly organized for this exam.

fantastic possibility to accumulate licensed HP0-J39 exam.
Me handed this HP0-J39 exam with question set. I did no longer having plenty time to prepare, i purchased this HP0-J39 questions answers and exam simulator, and this close up the quality expert selection I ever made. I were given thru the exam effects, even though its not an smooth one. But this included everything cutting-edge questions, and i had been given lots of them on the HP0-J39 exam, and turned into capable of discern out the relaxation, based totally on my enjoy. I guess it become as near 7c5d89b5be9179482b8568d00a9357b2 as an IT exam can get. So yes, is certainly as wholehearted as they insist its miles.

Get HP0-J39 certified with actual pick a peer at question financial institution.
I wanted to absorb certification in HP0-J39 exam and I elect question and retort for it. Everything is brilliantly arranged with I used it for topics dote information gathering and needs in HP0-J39 exam and I got 89 score attempting everything the question and it took me almost an hour and 20 minutes. gigantic thanks to killexams.

Forget everything! Just forcus on these HP0-J39 questions.
The answers are explained briefly in effortless language and nonetheless invent quite an result thats smooth to understand and follow. I took the assist of exam questions and handed my HP0-J39 exam with a healthful score of sixty nine. Thanks to exam questions . I would dote to imply in elect of exam questions for the instruction of HP0-J39 exam

simply try these dumps and success is yours. had enabled a pleasurable sustain the all while I used HP0-J39 prep aid from it. I followed the study guides, exam engine and, the HP0-J39 to every tiniest tiny detail. It was because of such fabulous means that I became expert in the HP0-J39 exam curriculum in matter of days and got the HP0-J39 certification with a biddable score. I am so grateful to every separate person behind the platform.

Passing HP0-J39 exam is simply click away!
I am now HP0-J39 certified and it could not breathe feasible with out HP0-J39 attempting out engine. exam simulator has been tailor-made maintaining in brain the requirements of the students which they confront on the time of taking HP0-J39 exam. This attempting out engine could breathe very tons exam focus and every concern depend has been addressed in ingredient virtually to preserve apprised the students from every and each information. team is watchful about that this is the manner to support college students confident and ever geared up for taking exam.

real test questions modern day HP0-J39 examination are available now.
This HP0-J39 sell off is notable and is without a doubt worth the cash. I am now not crazy about procuring stuff dote that, but because the exam is so steeply-priced and disturbing, I decided it would breathe smarter to accumulate a protection net, which means this bundle. This sell off is certainly rightly, the questions are cogent and the solutions are accurate, which I absorb double checked with some buddies (sometimes exam dumps give you incorrect answers, but now not this one). everything in all, I handed my exam simply the manner I hoped for, and now I endorse to every person.

Exactly same questions, WTF!
I had taken the HP0-J39 arrangement from the as that turned into a addupto stage for the preparation which had finally given the excellent stage of the planning to induce the 92% scores in the HP0-J39 test tests. I genuinely overjoyed within the gadget I got problems the matters emptied the challenging routine and via the uphold of the identical; I had at lengthy remaining were given the component out and about. It had made my arrangement a ton of less complicated and with the lead of the I had been organized to expand nicely inside the life.

Can I accumulate latest dumps with existent Q & A of HP0-J39 exam?
To invent positive the fulfillment in the HP0-J39 exam, I sought assist from the I chose it for several motives: their evaluation on the HP0-J39 exam ideas and regulations changed into wonderful, the material is actually user friendly, awesome quality and very imaginitive. most significantly, Dumps removed everything of the problems at the associated topics. Your material supplied generous contribution to my preparation and enabled me to succeed. i can firmly nation that it helped me acquire my achievement.

a route to withhold together for HP0-J39 examination?
preparing for HP0-J39 books may breathe a difficult process and 9 out of ten probabilities are that youll fail in case you Do it with noone preempt guidance. Thats where quality HP0-J39 e book comes in! It affords you with green and groovy data that no longer only complements your guidance however additionally offers you a antiseptic gash hazard of passing your HP0-J39 download and stepping into any university with noone melancholy. I organized through this brilliant software and that iscored 42 marks out of 50. i will assure you that its going to by no means assist you to down!

HP Designing and Implementation HP

Randomised reviews of health programmes: from design to implementation | existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

This suggestions is for the 2018/19 session.

Dr Mylene Lagarde COW 3.02

This route is attainable on the MSc in global fitness policy, MSc in health policy, Planning and Financing, MSc in overseas health coverage and MSc in foreign fitness coverage (health Economics). This route is attainable with consent as an outside alternative to students on other programmes where rules allow.

Randomized trials absorb lengthy been used within the clinical world to examine the efficacy of medical treatments. currently, sociable scientists absorb everything started using the identical approach, using random stint to allocate components or withhold in compel a coverage intervention otherwise to distinctive businesses, in an trouble to investigate the causal consequences of the coverage of hobby. The recognition of randomized critiques has grown above all, however not solely, amongst researchers and policymakers in low- and center-salary settings.

Conducting a a success randomized contrast involves many inter-linked steps and a biddable realizing of a yoke of statistical ideas. Randomized reviews also usually require to design and organise the facts collection of significant and constructive information, which comprises a number of crucial steps to evade pitfalls.  it's for this reason elementary to support in mind these different steps to design and invoke randomised evaluations accurately, or to breathe capable of severely analyse them.

This path proposes a fingers-on and intuitive routine to designing and conducting a randomised contrast. within the first half of the path, they are able to focus on causes for engaging in randomised evaluations; the route to design the randomise test to invent positive it answers the question(s) of pastime (including considerations of statistical vitality and pattern size calculation); how to deal with threats to randomisation. in the 2d half of the direction, they can talk about useful concerns raised by using fundamental data assortment, together with a route to most useful measure results of activity; a route to design first rate outfit and how to habits and control fieldwork.

Seminars may breathe designed to embolden students to severely engage with the issues and observe the technical competencies taught. each and every seminar might breathe carefully aligned with the lecture content to supply students the random to apply the brand current capabilities. Case stories might breathe chosen from numerous cultural backgrounds, to enable the presentation of a diverse latitude of settings and concerns.

15 hours of lectures and 15 hours of seminars in the LT.

A draft protocol. students will breathe requested to withhold up a short 1,500 breathe watchful draft protocol via week eight. whereas some facets of their toil can also nevertheless breathe toil in progress (e.g. using bullet features), students might breathe expected to withhold in writing up the first half of their protocol in a more designated manner. The outlines might breathe graded and remarks given to students. This permits college students to accumulate beneficial event of writing at MSc stage at LSE, and they will also breathe watchful more notably the expectations of the summative assessment. students might breathe capable of utilize this feedback of their writing of the summative work.

research inspiration (one hundred%) in the LT.

The aim of the research protocol (four,000 words max) could breathe to contrivance the randomised evaluation of a specific fitness programme. college students might breathe asked to opt for one programme from a proposed checklist. they're going to also breathe given the option to select their own intervention (pending agreement by means of their seminar leader).

HP Omen Reactor Gaming Mouse evaluation | existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Vivo spin-off IQOO is working on a foldable cellphone – birthright here's the proof Amazon's first Lord of the Rings teaser presents pointers for recur to core-earth crimson iPhone XS and XS Max can breathe here ahead of you thought

HP's subsequent-gen home windows blended fact headset will game a brand current design and excessive-res displays | existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Microsoft confirmed off the first consumer windows blended fact head-established displays (HMDs) from companions corresponding to Acer, Dell, HP, and Lenovo lower back in October 2017 at an adventure in San Francisco. The devices launched alongside the windows 10 topple Creators update, with expenditures starting at $299. The HMDs came with different designs, however equivalent standards comparable to a 1440X1440 resolution monitor, and framerates of 60fps for PCs with integrated snap shots and 90fps for methods with discrete photos.

whereas not an Awful lot in the approach of a refresh to a lot of these devices took place, Samsung launched its second-generation HMD, the Odyssey+ in October 2018, with advancements to necessities and the design of the gadget. soon, one other current headset may breathe on the way, as HP is also readying it subsequent-era HMD, as per the folks at RoadtoVR who acquired an unique preview of the unannounced windows blended reality headset, codenamed ‘Copper’.

The document states that HP is re-designing its HMD from the ground up, and from the looks of it, it does peer dote a significant update. The machine now activities an Oculus Rift-like design with the top straps going in the course of the facets and above the pinnacle, assembly at a round structure at the returned. The gadget is additionally expected to involve a heathered fabric on the front where the cameras for monitoring are located. The headset is declared to breathe lighter, making it greater at ease to wear, and it'll additionally feature stronger mechanicals to invent it easier to placed on and pick away.

As for specs, the next-generation machine will present a 2160X2160 resolution screen per eye, making it the most pixel-dense array in a mixed fact Headset yet. In evaluation, Samsung’s current Odyssey+ activities a 1440X1600 resolution reveal per eye. most likely, the denser reveal makes for crisp, transparent images, bringing much-essential advancements to the event. The denser screen also helps mask the screen door result (the repercussion caused by means of the unlit areas between any two pixels), negating the want for additional accessories just dote the diffuser on Samsung’s Odyssey+.

HP states that the improvements to the HMD came from its business valued clientele and that the consumers didn’t believe the container of view a gigantic enviornment of concern as a considerable deal as the resolution and comfort. The company is planning on bringing this headset to its device as a service for VR providing as a allotment of the Z through HP brand.

while HP didn't present particulars concerning the launch date or pricing, the enterprise did corroborate that it may breathe promoting the outfit to each, organisations and buyers. windows combined verity has been receiving improvements in the latest test builds for the subsequent essential home windows 10 replace, which may virtually actually breathe referred to as the home windows 10 April 2019 replace. The platform has additionally begun seeing multiplied relevance in gaming, so it should breathe enjoyable to peer how smartly ‘Copper’ will breathe acquired, and if the improvements inspire extra clients to faith it.

supply: RoadtoVR by the utilize of Thurrott

Obviously it is difficult assignment to pick solid certification questions/answers assets concerning review, reputation and validity since individuals accumulate sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report objection customers approach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effectively. They never trade off on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is vital to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. In the event that you contemplate any spurious report posted by their rivals with the title killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, dissension or something dote this, simply recollect there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of biddable administrations because of their advantages. There are a considerable many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Bootcamp Menu

000-996 existent questions | S10-200 mock exam | C2020-700 sample test | 000-113 dumps | HP0-M17 free pdf download | 000-474 free pdf | CAS-002 test questions | HP2-E60 existent questions | 1Z0-872 drill Test | MSPF bootcamp | 70-552-VB drill test | E20-535 exam questions | CPA test prep | C2040-924 exam prep | 70-551-CSharp braindumps | MB2-713 brain dumps | EE2-181 drill exam | 920-131 dump | HP0-780 braindumps | EK0-001 drill test |

Free HP0-J39 question bank
In the event that would you insist you are troubled how to pass your HP HP0-J39 Exam? With the assistance of the affirmed HP HP0-J39 Testing Engine you will design out how to blight your abilties. Most of the researchers begin recognizing when they find that they need to appear in IT confirmation. Their brain dumps are finished and to the point. The HP HP0-J39 PDF records invent your innovative and insightful substantial and assist you parts in guidance of the accreditation exam.

We absorb Tested and Approved HP0-J39 Exams. presents the most remedy and ultra-modern IT braindumps that nearly embody everything info references. With the helpful resource of their HP0-J39 exam dumps, you dont absorb to breathe compelled to blow a moment on analyzing bulk of reference books and easily absorb to breathe compelled to pay 10-20 hours to understand their HP0-J39 actual Questions and Answers. and that they provide you with PDF Version test Questions and Answers. For Exam Simulator Version dumps, Its offered to supply the candidates simulate the HP HP0-J39 exam in an exceedingly actual atmosphere. Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for everything tests on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $ninety nine SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for everything Orders Click As the most ingredient this is often in any aptitude very primary here is passing the HP0-J39 - Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions test. As everything that you need will breathe a lofty score of HP HP0-J39 exam. the solesolitary issue you wish to try to is downloading braindumps of HP0-J39 exam and memoize dumps. they are not letting you down and they will Do every assist to you pass your HP0-J39 exam. The professionals in dote means preserve tempo with the most best in magnificence test to supply most of updated dumps. 3 months free access to possess the potential to them via the date of purchase. each candidate will endure the fee of the HP0-J39 exam dumps through requiring very tiny to no struggle.

High quality HP0-J39 products: we've their specialists Team to invent positive their HP HP0-J39 exam questions are usually the latest. They are everything very acquainted with the exams and exam simulator middle.

How they support HP HP0-J39 assessments updated?: we've their special approaches to realize the modern-day exams data on HP HP0-J39. Sometimes they contact their companions who're very acquainted with the exam simulator heart or every so often their clients will e mail us the most current comments, or they were given the cutting-edge comments from their dumps market. Once they find the HP HP0-J39 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

Money returned assure?: if you really fail this HP0-J39 Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions and don’t want to peer ahead to the replace then they will approach up with complete refund. But you must ship your score report to us in order that they can absorb a check. They will approach up with complete refund birthright now for the duration of their operating time when they accumulate the HP HP0-J39 rating record from you.

HP HP0-J39 Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions Product Demo?: they absorb each PDF version and Software model. You can check their software page to peer the route it looks like. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for everything exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for everything Orders

When will I accumulate my HP0-J39 material once I pay?: Generally, After a hit payment your username/password are despatched at your email deal with inside five min. But if there is any postpone in bank side for saturate authorization, then it takes tiny longer.

Since 1997, we have provided a high quality education to our community with an emphasis on academic excellence and strong personal values.

Killexams 000-M17 braindumps | Killexams M2010-701 examcollection | Killexams 1Z0-347 questions answers | Killexams CAT-040 dumps questions | Killexams NS0-310 study guide | Killexams C2180-274 questions and answers | Killexams A2010-579 drill test | Killexams 000-609 brain dumps | Killexams 9A0-056 free pdf | Killexams A2040-406 exam questions | Killexams 2B0-104 existent questions | Killexams 1Z0-432 cheat sheets | Killexams A2010-502 bootcamp | Killexams MB3-210 test prep | Killexams COG-135 drill questions | Killexams 1Z0-161 cram | Killexams C5050-408 drill questions | Killexams 920-552 existent questions | Killexams C9020-662 free pdf | Killexams 9A0-086 braindumps |

Exam Simulator : Pass4sure HP0-J39 Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams 9A0-331 questions and answers | Killexams 920-326 drill test | Killexams BCP-521 drill test | Killexams 000-N12 questions and answers | Killexams 9A0-901 test prep | Killexams A2010-569 test prep | Killexams HP2-E50 bootcamp | Killexams C7010-010 examcollection | Killexams COG-703 existent questions | Killexams 920-544 braindumps | Killexams C2040-405 VCE | Killexams 250-510 exam prep | Killexams HP0-D06 test questions | Killexams 00M-227 free pdf download | Killexams M2010-727 braindumps | Killexams P2090-050 dumps | Killexams 650-180 existent questions | Killexams C2010-024 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-M62 mock exam | Killexams HP0-P17 sample test |

Designing and Implementation HP P4000(R) SAN Solutions

Pass 4 positive HP0-J39 dumps | HP0-J39 existent questions |

SAP System Landscape Design and Planning Approaches | existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

This chapter is from the book 

Remember, a system landscape exists for each mySAP solution—if you deploy R/3, APO, CRM, and PLM, you will in result breathe creating four different SAP system landscapes, one for each product. The focus in this and the following few sections, though, is on what one of these system landscapes looks dote from a design and planning perspective, for sample R/3 solitary or APO alone.

In the most generic form, an SAP system landscape consists of SAP instances (installations of the SAP database and application software) and SAP servers. In the Microsoft world of SAP implementations, there is a one-to-one correlation between instances and servers nearly everything the time. That is, the evolution instance resides on a dedicated evolution server, the Test instance resides on a dedicated Test server, and so on. In the world of UNIX implementations, though, multiple instances can breathe often institute on a separate "larger" server. For example, both evolution and Test instances can reside on a separate server. And multiple application instances can breathe installed on a separate server as well.

Until eventual year's release of SAP's Multiple Components, One Database (MCOD) initiative, there was a one-to-one correlation between instances and database systems, too, regardless of the Operating System platform. MCOD is beginning to change this, such that a separate "larger" database can breathe leveraged for multiple instances. However, an primary contrast between MCOD and multiple instances/one server exists—MCOD ties the same character of databases within different SAP system landscapes together. With MCOD, everything evolution databases used by your R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace implementations can breathe one and the same. Similarly, everything Test databases across R/3, SRM, CRM, and Workplace can breathe bundled together, too, as illustrated in design 3.3. Note, however, that in many cases SAP AG frowns on mixing OLTP and OLAP systems, or combining different databases within the same system landscape. In that regard, forcing an MCOD database server to host your R/3 system's evolution and Test databases would therefore breathe unsupported and perverse to best practices.

Figure 3.3Figure 3.3 A properly architected sample MCOD deployment is displayed for a typical mySAP enterprise consisting of R/3, CRM, SRM, and Workplace.

As they meander forward with their basic understanding of SAP system landscapes, and hunt to understand how your SAP solution vision impacts and is impacted by your landscape decisions, my hope is to achieve the following:

  • Note the relative significance and relationship of technology perspectives to their solution vision

  • Understand why each system landscape is primary to fulfilling their vision

  • Note how the presence or absence of a particular system within a landscape impacts the other systems and ultimately the overall solution vision

  • All these design and planning approaches I cover minister to approach into play in one manner or another across everything mySAP implementations. It's how they are weighted or addressed that makes one system landscape different from the next.

    Simplifying Your SAP System Landscape

    After spending time with hundreds of customers and SAP implementations, I contemplate it is safe to insist that when everything things are equal, the want to simplify emerges as an primary driver. Simplification takes many forms, too. In the case of the SAP system landscape and how it fulfills their SAP solution vision, the want to simplify manifests itself in any number of ways:

  • First, the absolute number of instances will breathe reduced to the fewest necessary to accumulate the job done "right" for a particular company. An organization focused on simplifying administrative, change management, systems management, operations, and other tasks will deploy a three-system or even a two-system landscape, whereas similar organizations without the same simplification goals can deploy more. There are trade-offs, of course. A system landscape without a dedicated test instance will, for example, breathe forced to fulfill testing in the same system used for development. Because of these kinds of limitations, simplification achieved through instance reductions is not as common as it has been in the past.

  • Instead, a more approved approach to simplification seeks to reduce the number of physical servers in a particular system landscape, by installing multiple instances on a separate server. Consolidation of instances is becoming quite common in SAP customer environments today, as displayed in design 3.4.

  • Figure 3.4Figure 3.4 Multiple SAP instances can breathe installed and configured on a separate physical server, oftentimes reducing both acquisition and systems management costs down the road.

  • Similarly, deploying a shared disk subsystem and tape backup/restore solution also simplifies a very tangled piece of the SAP Solution Stack. This is why my colleagues and I absorb spent so much time in the eventual two years designing and implementing Storage belt Networks, or SANs—they provide outstanding performance while simultaneously reducing system landscape complexity and allowing expensive resources dote enterprise tape libraries to breathe shared between systems.

  • Another customer of mine shared with me why they went with the WebGUI as opposed to the classic SAPGUI approach to system accessibility—to simplify desktop uphold and maintenance requirements.

  • Companies that value simplification will also standardize on a particular solution stack option or approach, too, as this simplifies uphold and maintenance, and minimizes the need for a variety of onsite/reserved spare parts, the time spent in change management activities, and more.

  • Although simplification tends to toil in one direction by encouraging a "do more with less" philosophy, their next topic goes the other route in that it purposefully introduces complexity and differences between various systems within a system landscape—high availability.

    High Availability and the SAP System Landscape

    When it comes to lofty availability, many technology professionals automatically contemplate about what it means to better the availability of a particular system or hardware component—thoughts of basic HA offerings dote clustering or redundancy approach to mind. With regard to the broader topic of how your solution vision impacts your SAP system landscape, though, lofty availability equates to the following:

  • Business-driven requirements—HA offerings and approaches are normally implemented to satisfy specific business-oriented needs, and therefore shape an integral allotment of your overall SAP solution vision.

  • Complexity—HA complicates the SAP system landscape, as HA offerings and approaches minister to only really exist or apply to the Production system and at minimum (hopefully!) another similarly configured system within the landscape.

  • Increased uphold needs—Because HA offerings are inherently complex, a very existent need exists to prepare your SAP uphold organization in how to install it, update it, manage it, and troubleshoot HA issues.

  • To read more about how business requirements relate to lofty availability, contemplate "Availability Planning—Documenting Requirements and Key Drivers," p. 167 in Chapter 6.

    Disaster Recovery Considerations

    All companies implement a routine of addressing disaster Recovery (DR), whether or not they actually realize it. Even companies that Do not add a dedicated DR system to their system landscape address disaster recovery. That is, their de facto disaster recovery contrivance simply reflects the challenges and timeframes surrounding rebuilding their SAP system from scratch, restoring from their latest tape backup, and imposing upon their close users to manually rekey any current business transactions lost between the eventual successful tape backup and the point at which the disaster occurred. This doesn't sound dote much of a "plan," of course, but it does depict a baseline against which everything other disaster recovery approaches and solutions can breathe weighed.

    A host of DR approaches are discussed throughout Chapter 6, from those involving disk subsystem data replication solutions, to various clustering solutions, to database and mySAP-specific tactics. But when it comes to sifting the potential layout of your SAP system landscape through your solution vision, two generic approaches topple out:

    Both approaches are valid, and the first is more traditional. But I believe that the time and expense related to setting up, configuring, keeping current, and managing your own DR system explains the recent multiply in outsourcing I've seen over the eventual two years.

    To review some of the tasks and considerations inherent to addressing DR internally as opposed to outsourcing it, contemplate "SAP generic Availability and DR Best Practices," p. 207 in Chapter 6.

    Companies that outsource the DR component of their SAP system landscape assist to preserve their data, and access to this data, in that the outsourcer operates a completely independent data center, typically in a very different geographic location. For smaller and mid-size companies with only a separate data center, the expense relief is tremendous. On the other hand, if the DR solution is maintained "in-house," so to speak, it will need to breathe housed in a divide facility. This solitary is positive to drive complexity, cost, and even the architecture and makeup of both the SAP system landscape and its individual systems.

    Addressing Training Requirements

    The SAP system landscape is directly impacted by the potential need to train SAP close users as well as the system's developers and technical uphold staff. Three different systems approach into play, as illustrated in design 3.5:

  • A dedicated Training system is often implemented to assist in teaching users current to a particular mySAP component how to actually utilize the system. This amounts to business-process training as well as SAP user interface training (an excellent alternative to creating multiple training clients on the Test system, which is diligent fulfilling integration responsibilities prior to Go-Live—the exact time when close users need to breathe trained!). To provide the most value to its students, the Training system needs to breathe an exact copy of Production.

  • A dedicated Technical Sandbox system is extremely useful in helping the SAP Technical uphold Organization (SAP TSO) accumulate up to speed on the entire SAP Solution Stack, especially with regard to current components and tangled HA offerings (rather than attempting to accumulate time on other systems for what could amount to crash-and-burn testing).

  • A dedicated business Sandbox or evolution Sandbox system allows developers unfamiliar with a particular mySAP component, or faced with integrating multiple components and other legacy systems, the opening to Do so in a absolute testing environment (rather than the existent evolution system).

  • Figure 3.5Figure 3.5 These SAP training systems uphold the different needs of different organizations, from close users, to developers and programmers, to technical implementation specialists.

    For details as to how the SAP system landscape satisfies the training needs of both the SAP Technical uphold Organization and the production system's close users, contemplate "Training and the Role of the SAP System Landscape," p. 314 in Chapter 9.

    It can depict quite a challenge for the "customers" of one of these training systems to convince everyone that such a system is truly required. In my own experience, I absorb seen the lack of a Technical Sandbox really harm an organization in terms of downtime due to botched infrastructure upgrades and changes to DR processes.

    Another colleague of mine has more than once had to strongly push for the adoption of a Training system, too. Such a system allows for extensive informal user testing and drill outside of formally delivered training. He believes that this extra smooth of hands-on self-directed training is censorious because your end-user community is best positioned of everything groups to find business-process operational errors and limitations. And of course it is desirable to remedy these issues well before Go-Live. But a consultant or even a senior super user is typically not positioned to push the adoption and utilize of a dedicated Training system. More often than not, it takes the SAP Steering Committee, the project's experienced management team, and the prodding of a knowledgeable SAP Solution Architect to Do so. I cannot stress this enough—the risk is huge, in that you Do not want to find out too late that not every business scenario works as it did during integration testing (for example, everything types of contracts, everything types of material movements, everything kinds of accounting entries, and so on).

    The Performance-Driven System Landscape

    When it comes to evaluating your solution vision against the layout of your SAP system landscape, it is primary to ensure that the performance of the systems meets the needs of their different end-user communities. Most of the time, of course, the focus is on designing, installing, and configuring a well-performing Production system. Performance considerations usually relate back to what an close user will sustain while on the system, including

  • Business transaction response times, or how long it takes to refresh your SAPGUI after pressing the Enter key, for example.

  • How quickly a background or "batch" job will execute, otherwise known as throughput.

  • How quickly a report or other query will invent it through the system and actually breathe printed, sometimes called latency.

  • To read more about verifying that a Production system can meet performance expectations, contemplate "Key SAP Stress-Testing Considerations," p. 580 in Chapter 16.

    However, these same performance considerations apply to everything of the other systems within the SAP system landscape, too. The evolution system, for example, needs to exhibit excellent performance even while 25 or 50 or more developers are banging away at keyboards trying to build your custom mySAP solution. Similarly, your Test system needs to provide the performance necessary to accumulate through integration testing. Even the Training system needs to provide adequate user response times so as to invent the actual training sustain more than something to breathe avoided.

    High-performance considerations cover the gamut, touching every facet of every system within the landscape. This means that everything—from the performance of the network connecting each system, to each server's CPU, RAM, and disk configuration, to each system's OS, database, and mySAP component—must breathe addressed. Starting off on the birthright foot (with properly sized and configured hardware and software elements) is paramount, of course, but tuning everything these solution stack pieces to create a cohesive well-running machine is just as primary to achieving excellent performance. dote the weakest link in a chain, a separate underperforming solution component will only throttle back the maximum performance otherwise obtainable from your system.

    Driving Scalability into Your System Landscape

    The need for scalability, dote lofty availability and excellent performance, is addressed primarily through the sizing process. Scalability does not pay off up front in terms of improved system availability or better user response times, though. Rather, scalability is everything about paying for "headroom" in your system, headroom that is not actually needed at present but might breathe required in the near future. In other words, scalability addresses future planned and unplanned growth in your system.

    This growth can manifest itself in a number of ways. In my sustain in the existent world, I absorb seen the results of unplanned growth harm companies where scalability was never addressed, as in the following cases:

  • The number of close users increased at one of my current accounts, not due to more hiring than was anticipated when their solution was crafted, but because they unexpectedly acquired their competitor and doubled in size. They had six months to project the delta needed in terms of database and application server processing power and RAM requirements, followed by stress-testing the current design and finally implementing it.

  • More than one of my customers' databases grew so posthaste that they outstripped the results of their comprehensive three-year database sizing methodology in the first year! In most cases, the system they withhold in status for these customers was scalable—more disk drives could breathe added, smaller drives could breathe swapped with larger ones, and so on. In three cases in particular, though, the database growth was so explosive that a all current disk subsystem platform needed to breathe brought in, and the recently acquired current platform retired (or redeployed) years earlier than expected.

  • When databases grow quickly, the tape backup/restore solution implemented often grows less efficient as well. I absorb seen this most often in relatively diminutive SAP implementations, where an initial investment in tape backup technology needed to breathe tossed in favor of tape solutions that backed up more data per tape cartridge, and did so posthaste enough to not exceed the customer's backup window (time allotted to fulfill a backup, which usually equates to planned downtime in the case of offline complete backups).

  • It's been a while, but I also had a customer outgrow their network, too. Today, with switched networks and Gigabit Ethernet providing more than adequate bandwidth to every server component, and cheap 10- and 100-Megabit Ethernet prevalent across end-user workstations, there's no excuse for lacking network scalability.

  • Outstripping the capabilities of your current system such that a current platform is needed probably represents a worst-case scenario. Not only does the current Production component need to breathe replaced, but to uphold sound change control principles, so does the same component in your Test, Staging, and/or Technical Sandbox environments.

    This is why hardware and software vendors tout things dote "highly scalable system architectures," "enterprise versions" of particular Operating Systems and Database Systems, and so on—though not necessarily needed up front, the headroom that these approaches provide helps an organization feel more comfortable if they wind up growing faster than they expected. And hardware vendors in particular can position their SAP clients for improved scalability by practicing the following:

  • Specify server platforms that allow additional CPUs and RAM to breathe added as needed. In other words, avoid "maxing out" the box.

  • Alternatively, design SAP solutions such that they pick advantage of SAP's uphold for horizontal scalability. This is one of my favorite approaches when it comes to SAP Application, Web AS, J2EE middleware, and ITS servers—I prefer to max them out with regard to processors, with the understanding that an incremental number of servers can breathe added at any time should the environment grow to require it (interestingly, although SAP has successfully tested a system running more than 160 application servers, it is rare to find customer implementations with more than 10 or 12).

  • Architect a solution for the preempt smooth of plumb scalability. In other words, if a two-tier "Central System" (where everything SAP software components execute on the same physical server) approach to sizing meets today's requirements, perhaps a three-tier solution will provide for unknown scalability requirements. In a three-tiered architecture, one database server and multiple application servers are configured as a separate system image.

  • Architect a highly scalable database platform. As my real-world examples earlier in this list illustrate, this tends to breathe where a lack of scalability causes the most problems.

  • Hardware and software vendors alike spend a considerable deal of time "proving" how scalable their offerings are. As a first step, I imply that benchmarks, customer references/feedback, and the results of tests published through white papers and other technical documents breathe reviewed by prospective mySAP customers. I also imply that you begin considering current approaches to scalability. For example, HP's iCOD offering touts "capacity on demand." When a customer buys a server, for instance, it is fully populated with CPUs. The customer pays for only what is needed in the near term, however. Later, if it is determined that more processing power is required, the customer takes advantage of the in-place processors by merely applying for a license; no intrusive realm upgrade or service convene is required and therefore the need for planned downtime is drastically reduced.

    The TCO-Driven System Landscape

    More than anything else, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) drives what a solution vision actually looks dote at the close of the day, when a mySAP solution is implemented and really being used. Discussions on TCO might instead breathe labeled recur on Investment (ROI), or might topple under the heading of investment protection. Regardless, a focus on lowering TCO seeks to find less expensive solution-stack alternatives that quiet meet the needs of the business.

    To read more about the relationship between TCO and your SAP solution vision, contemplate "How the SAP Solution Vision Drives TCO," p. 127 in Chapter 5.

    When everything other things are equal, the following points apply from a hardware perspective:

  • A hardware vendor's utilize of common components dote CPUs and recollection boards allows flexible sharing of resources between different SAP system landscapes and in some cases hardware platforms, too.

  • Similarly, common disk drive shape factors reduce cost of ownership by increasing reusability.

  • Support for hot-pluggable and/or hot-add hardware components eliminates or worst-case minimizes downtime (can involve difficult drives, tape drives, power supplies, fans, and even RAM and processors).

  • Support for redundant components, dote power supplies, disk drives, fans, and so on, also eliminates or minimizes downtime.

  • The aptitude to dash mixed-speed CPUs or RAM in a particular platform protects that investment—CPUs and RAM Do not absorb to breathe tossed aside when additional processing power or recollection is required.

  • Outsourcing your entire SAP infrastructure/operations team is another potential routine of reducing TCO. In fact, outsourcing can depict the biggest potential TCO factor that a company will consider. At this level, though, outsourcing becomes more of a strategic business solution that impacts a lot more than simply TCO. True, outsourcing can gash labor costs by 50%, and enhance flexibility of a technical uphold organization to easily change as business requirements change, but there are drawbacks and disadvantages as well (discussed later in this chapter).

    Another solution vision approach that impacts the SAP system landscape from both a configuration and TCO perspective is the utilize of an Application Service Provider (ASP). ASPs can drive lower TCO by virtue of their application-specific expertise, above and beyond that provided by in-house staff and traditional outsourcing providers. For example:

  • An ASP can offer a preconfigured solution stack for the particular mySAP solution you want to implement. This is one reason why they peer so biddable from a TCO perspective—design, deployment, manageability, operations, and other cost factors are substantially reduced due to a lofty smooth of both standardization and core competencies in the services they provide.

  • ASPs were more or less born out of the dot-com era, and by virtue of this, their data centers like the profit of tubby redundant pipes to the Internet. Thus, applications are well positioned to pick advantage of this flexible and powerful accessibility option.

  • ASPs offer challenging financing alternatives, in that they ally with various SAP technology partners to invent leasing, pay-as-you-go, and other payment methods available.

  • The ASP provider market shrank over the eventual few years. The mySAP-focused companies that weathered these difficult times seem even better prepared and well-positioned to host SAP solutions, however.

    Security Considerations

    I know of no company that does not envision protecting its corporate computing assets. From a solution-stack security perspective, not everything software vendors are created equal, however. Oracle touts its unbreakable database, UNIX vendors tout the robust security features of their operating environments, and so on. In my eyes, security features are very important, but biddable security is more often about managing and testing changes to a solution stack, by carefully identifying security holes and other weaknesses in current solution stack components before these components ever find themselves in Production.

    However, companies that embrace and act upon the notion of protecting computing assets will prove to breathe better partners in the long run. This is why I believe that Oracle's focus on security will pay gigantic dividends in terms of slowing the adoption of competing databases. And it is why I believe that the Trusted PC joint Intel, AMD, and Microsoft vision (once labeled by Microsoft as Palladium, and now referred to as the "next-generation secure computing basis for Windows") will prove fruitful as well. Its goal is to build security into servers and PCs at a microprocessor level. current initiatives coming out of the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance swear to better secure their processing platforms, ensuring that only authorized applications and program executables can ever breathe executed by the system, and that everything data housed on the system is encrypted so that it is useless to others. To this end, Microsoft considers Trusted PC a significant allotment of its Trustworthy Computing strategy—we should contemplate something commercially available in this regard by 2004 that applies to server as well as desktop and other computing platforms.

    Manageability Considerations

    No customers of mine absorb ever started their initial SAP implementation planning discussions with me by saying:

    "George, everything that high-availability and performance stuff is fine, but what they really want is a nice manageable system. Can you Do that for us?"

    By the time Go-Live looms just over the horizon, though, every separate one of them—without exception—has indicated a growing concern for manageability. Sure, it's there on the project plan, and any number of products can breathe used to uphold managing your mySAP environment. But the all realm of manageability is more tangled and more toil than you would imagine. reckon the following:

  • Each layer in the SAP Solution Stack must breathe managed; the risk of not keeping an eye on a particular layer or solution component affects the uptime of the entire system.

  • Because each layer is so different from the others, it's nearly impossible to find a separate management product that can actually monitor and report on more than a few layers, much less the entire stack.

  • Therefore, the next best thing becomes trying to find a product that can at least interoperate successfully with other products.

  • At the close of the day, three, four, or even more tools and utilities must ultimately breathe fused together to provide a holistic view of a mySAP solution stack. This is challenging, to insist the least!

  • To learn exactly how challenging piecing together a management approach can be, contemplate "Systems Management Techniques for SAP," p. 511 in Chapter 14.

    Because of the challenges inherent to managing hardware and software products from a lot of different solution stack vendors, some of my customers absorb purposely chosen less than "best-of-breed" products for their SAP solutions, so as to minimize the number of software partners involved. Or they absorb decided to reduce the number of partners and vendors altogether by selecting one of the gigantic enterprise hardware/services vendors. The obvious partners are clear—HP, IBM, and Sun. For example, if you meander with HP and elect to implement an rp8400-based server platform with an HP StorageWorks SAN, running HP-UX 11i, and managed by HP OpenView, the challenges inherent to managing four different vendors' products just dropped tremendously. Similar arguments could breathe made for going with an IBM or Sun solution stack, too—IBM even throws a yoke of databases into the mix.

    The System Landscape and Accessibility

    The eventual belt I want to cover with regard to solution vision and the SAP system landscape is accessibility. Many companies over the eventual three or four years absorb started with a vision of dumping everything application-specific interfaces in favor of browser-enabled solutions, so as to ease the burdens and costs associated with desktop/laptop management while opening up current accessibility approaches dote hand-helds and other wireless devices. SAP has supported that vision since 1996, with the advent of Internet connectivity in R/3 3.1G. But only in the eventual few years absorb I really seen this pick off.

    SAP AG offers quite a few accessibility options today when it comes to mySAP solutions. The classic SAPGUI and its revamped and more capable EnjoySAP SAPGUI depict one close of the spectrum. This approach is safe, very mainstream, and very effortless to implement. And the SAPGUI they absorb today is extremely comprehensive, supporting everything mySAP components through a separate interface, which is unlike the approach a few years ago where each so-called "New Dimension" product dote BW or APO required its own GUI. But the SAPGUI quiet represents a typical application-specific approach to accessibility; each close user installs the client on their desktop or laptop, or runs the SAPGUI from a network share, and off they go.

    Other accessibility approaches are available, however, as you contemplate in design 3.6. The original WebGUI, for example, is based on HTML and provides connectivity via Microsoft's Internet Explorer and so on. And a more recent addition, the JavaGUI, allows aboriginal Java-based access to SAP. Both of these approaches fulfill an Internet-based approach to connectivity, and subsequently simplify the desktop (assuming Internet connectivity is a touchstone desktop offering at your particular company, of course).

    Figure 3.6Figure 3.6 Access to mySAP solutions is quite varied today, ranging from classic and updated SAPGUI options to newer Web-enabled versions.

    Onsite news | existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    On this page:

       Thursday 25 February   Wednesday 24 February   Tuesday 23 February   Monday 22 February

    The Photo Gallery highlights technical events, the Exhibition, and more.

    The Mock trial Photo Gallery provides coverage of judges, wigs, and much more.

    SPIE Advanced Lithography Plenary

    Thursday 25 February 2010

    It’s back: Energy returns to lithographyIt was transparent throughout SPIE Advanced Lithography that energy has returned to the lithography sector, agreed Symposium Chairs Christopher Progler and Donis Flagello. They praised the outstanding toil on the allotment of conference chairs in organizing the programs, and the high-quality of content presented by the authors.

    The week was characterized by complete conference rooms, diligent exhibit aisles, and networking that started over breakfast and continued long past dusk. Technical conference attendance was another indicator, coming in nearly one-third higher than eventual year. The final signify for total attendance for 2010 was 2,100.

    Standing-room-only conference rooms and high-energy networking continued through the final day, with the eventual sessions in five conferences, professional evolution courses, and award announcements topping off the week.

    Andrew Estroff,

    Rochester Institute of Technology, was given the Cymer-sponsored Best Student Paper in Optical Metrology Award for his paper on “Metamaterials for enhancement of DUV lithography.” Marshall Miller, Univ. California, Berkeley, won Honorary Mention for his paper on “Automatic numerical determination of lateral influence functions for posthaste CAD.”

    Technical special events concluded with a panel discussion on reference metrology in the nanotechnology process. The panel was moderated by Vladmir Ukraintsev, and included six panelists from Asia, Europe, and North America representing industry, academia, research, and manufacturing perspectives. Held in the Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control conference, the panel was also a allotment of the Global Collaboration in Reference Metrology working group meeting.

    Wednesday 24 February 2010

    Full rooms, diligent aislesAll six conferences were in session on Wednesday, with many papers drawing packed audiences. Technical attendance is up more than 25% at this year’s SPIE Advanced Lithography, reflecting an optimistic trend throughout the industry.

    Technical special events included a panel sponsored by NIST on “Strategies for increasing the value of metrology and inspection,” and a well-attended poster session for conferences on EUV, Alternative Technologies, Optical Microlithography, and Design for Manufacturability through DPI. Moderators for the NIST panel were George Orji and Ronald Dixson.

    On Day Two in the exhibition hall, the aisles were complete of shoppers and customers,

    and exhibitors reported much deal making on the floor as well as at the numerous company events. “Based on AL and other indicators, 2010 looks better,” said Sara Eideh of Synopsys. “We are delighted with how biddable Advanced Lithography 2010 has been.” Eideh said turnout for her company was nearly 50% better than eventual year.

    Tuesday 23 February 2010

    Panel Discussions Address Nano and EUVSPIE Advanced Lithography continues to breathe the status to find the birthright people, according to Day One feedback from exhibitors, with the steady traffic and stout energy on the exhibit floor providing more positive indicators of economic health. In the words of Wilma Koolen-Hermken, CEO of HamaTech,“It is obvious by the success of the meeting that the industry has begun to circle around."

    Others were enthusiastic as well. "Advanced Lithography is awesome, as always," said Ron Synowicki of J.A. Woollam, who was already pleased with the leads he had gotten only four hours into the show. "Nothing is better than face-to-face interaction with customers. We're seeing a considerable blend of academia and industry."

    “We were delighted that the attendees came in for afternoon coffee and stayed to talk business," said Patti Shaw of Brewer Science. "Leads are up over eventual year and the quality is good." Shaw said that Brewer doubled the number of staff they brought to Advanced Lithography this year, another indicator that business is on a up-swing.

    Conference rooms were diligent throughout the day and at times standing-room-only, and a panel on metrology in the current economy closed the day for the Metrology, Inpsection, and Process Control conference.

    A Women in Optics luncheon presentation featured a talk by Anna Sidana of One Million Lights, an initiative to better education, personal income, health, and environmental quality in developing countries by replacing kerosene lamps with portable solar lighting.

    It was a diligent evening as well, with approximately 1,000 attendees at the first of the week's two poster sessions, and a spirited "trial" pitting EUV against DPT.

    Mock trial Examines compete TechnologiesOnly at SPIE Advanced Lithography in San Jose will you witness the world's top minds in the semiconductor industry donning black robes and white wigs and participating in a mock trial (heavy on the "mock") to determine the feasibility of compete technologies for the 22-nm HP node and beyond.

    Like a scene from Inherit the Wind or To execute a Mockingbird

    seen through psychedelic lenses, an overflowing courtroom brimming with standing observers rose to honor Judges Chris Progler of Photronics and Donis Flagello of Nikon as they entered the court. Representing EUVL were Obert Wood and Bruno La Fontaine of Global Foundries, and representing double patterning ArF were Will Conley of Freescale and Mircea Dusa of ASML.

    The judges encouraged the audience, who were serving as jury, to meander to the side of the elbowroom they agreed with as the trial progressed. This would prove difficult, as everything seats and everything standing elbowroom was well occupied with rapt observers. judge Flagello reiterated that this court observed no legal code other than Moore's Law, and as evidence of this, the jury was asked to stand and bow allegiance to a massive, projected image of Gordon Moore.

    Opening arguments began with the case for EUVL, argued by Wood, who asserted that "it's everything about k1." Comparing EUV vs DPL 193i, he showed significant degradation in DPL vs EUVL at 40-nm HP, and claimed that 22-nm HP was simply not viable with double patterning, while Zeiss had optical designs already to extend EUVL to below 22 nm.

    Conley went on the assault in his opening arguments for double patterning, showing roadmaps of ArF pitch division vs EUV.

    As a first witness, Skip Miller of ASML presented his cost analysis for patterning options at 2x-nm HP, showing that single-exposure EUV displayed the lowest cost of everything options.

    Tatsuhiko Higashiki of Toshiba showed the Toshiba roadmap for EUVL to extend the spacer process, declaring that a 2x-nm HP node process study will begin this year or next to address some primary challenge, such as defectively < 0.1/cm2 and throughput above 100 wph.

    Janice Golda then showed Intel's needs to ramp up manufacturing at the 22-nm node by 2015. For logic layouts, she said, one might need 4 or more masks. She also asserted that a microprocessor company dote Intel is much more sensitive to mask defectively than a recollection maker, so Intel was challenged to invent a zero-defect EUV reticle, which they did accomplish recently.

    Paul Ackmann from Global Foundries pointed out that the biggest issue is getting a current technology in status as soon as possible, and EUV has an advantage in that it can backfill to earlier technologies , while DPL cannot.

    Nigel Ferrar of Cymer was asked whether EUVL could breathe powered without a nuclear power plant, a reference to char Lin's oft-quoted assertion that EUVL sources will absorb exorbitant power needs. Ferrar stated that needs will breathe ~3x what an ArF scanner requires today, and that a 350 W source that delivers 150 wph will breathe available in 2011.

    An energetic Conley then cross-examined the EUV team's witnesses on source power with a comedic design of EUVL powered by the Hoover Dam, and plotted his estimation of EUV fab and implement costs vs the GDPs of countries dote Tonga, Belize, and Latvia.

    The witnesses for DPL then took the stand, beginning with Kevin Lucas of Synopsis, who showed multiple design rule and patterning options to extend into 22 nm and below.

    Kit Ausschnitt of IBM quoted Hamlet and displayed a very realistic animation of the "overlay elephant" that must breathe confronted to meander to smaller nodes. He stated that overlay improvements will enable 193 nm DPL extension to 22 nm and beyond, but there will breathe no dearth of overlay challenges in either case. Certainly, he said, EUV is inevitable, but so is the imminent collapse of their sun. Possibly, he jabbed, EUVL will breathe ready by then.

    Andrew Hazelton of Nikon then pointed to Nikon's S620D shown in the Plenaries to present that DP is available today, and Patrick Wong of IMEC showed that for the 22 nm node, various solutions present swear for different layers and applications.

    Wood's Perry-Masonesque cross-examination of the DPL witnesses focused on the cost issues and complexity of the many masks necessary. The DPL witnesses rebutted his math and stood their ground that overlay was not a problem for DPL.

    After closing arguments, judge Progler celebrated that the sheer number of observers serving as jurists made stirring to their favored side of the elbowroom impossible, so he called for applause to determine the trial's winner. With equal applause, Progler declared a hung jury and adjourned, hinting that a retrial will breathe needed next year.

    Many more photos are available in the Mock trial Photo Gallery.

    Monday 22 February 2010

    Panel Discussions Address Nano and EUV

    Nanotechnology in Microlithography Panel Discussion: Self-Assembling Molecules for Semiconductor Patterning and Nanoelectronics

    Panel Moderators: Richard M. Silver, National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States) and Christopher L. Soles, NIST (United States)

    The evening panel discussion on nanotechnology in microlithography opened with comments by moderator Christopher Soles of NIST, who set the tone by contrasting "bottom-up" processes dote self-assembly (SA) with traditional "top-down" lithographic processes. Between these technologies, Soles explained, they absorb major differences - natural shapes vs conventional circuit design, local vs long-range order, monolayers vs lofty aspect ratio features, CMOS vs emerging applications, intrinsic scaling limits vs nanoscale dimensions, wet, soft processes vs antiseptic elbowroom processes, unhurried ordering vs 100 wph, and the current pretty research pictures of SA vs wholehearted functional devices using lithography. He invited the panelists to dispute the near- and long-term prospects of SA and dispute the materials and metrology needs.

    Dan Herr of SRC then presented some of the challenges of directed self-assembly, including the needed shapes, throughput, and defects. He asserted that SA could very well breathe an augmenting technology to current processes rather than a competing technology.

    Greg Waldraff of IBM followed by presenting examples of electronic component self assembly on templated DNA biogrids, describing the aptitude of DNA origami to create nanoscale devices.

    Lars Liebman, also of IBM, made a case for beginning research now at the NSF smooth so that the technology is age by 2016-2017, the time term Herr had predicted SA could breathe introduced into manufacturing. However, he cautioned that the community needs to breathe positive it is tackling the birthright problem and not ignoring trimming or other issues.

    Joy Cheng of IBM joined her colleague, Dan Herr, in displaying recent toil in polymer self assembly, and Katy Bosworth predicted that the toil they are doing at Hitachi on difficult drive media could breathe one of the first to interpolate block copolymers into a lithographic process.

    Robert Brainard of Albany CNSE concluded the presentations by showing the relationship between chemically amplified resists, nanoimprint, and self assembly, asserting that each technology has considerable strengths but will not breathe replacing each other. The panel then opened for debate and questions from the audience.

    BACUS Technical Group Panel Discussion: EUV Source $10M. EUV Scanner $100M. Defect Free EUV Photomask, Priceless! For some there's NIL, for everyone else, there's EUV.

    Panel Moderators: Bryan S. Kasprowicz, Photronics, Inc.; Franklin D. Kalk, Toppan Photomasks, Inc. Panel members (from left): Gilroy Vandentop, Bryan Rice, Anthony Yen, Oliver Kienzle, Tatsuhiko Higashiki, Paul Ackmann, Ben Eynon.

    Advanced Lithography opens to optimism, overflowing house

    A standing-room-only audience for the opening plenary session at SPIE Advanced Lithography in San Jose served as one more symptom that the lithography industry is in a growth mode. Before the speakers from Nikon, Intel, and the venture capital difficult Silver Lake Partners took the stage, a prestigious optical microlithography award and five current Fellows of SPIE were announced.

    M. David Levenson, now associated with BetaSights, was named this year’s winner of the Frits Zernike Award for Advances in Optical Microlithography, for his toil in developing aspect shifting masks. The Frits Zernike Award is sponsored by Cymer and ASML.

    The five current Fellows from the lithography community -- Robert Allen, Jon Benschop, Clifford Henderson, Soichi Owa, and James Potzick -- are among a total of 62 current Fellows of SPIE elected this year. The current Fellows were honored with 20 other lithography Fellows at a luncheon later in the day.

    More awards followed the talks, including:

    C. accord Willson Best Paper award for 2009, to Richard Lawson, Laren Tolbert, and Clifford Henderson of Georgia Tech and Todd Younkin of Intel Corp.

    Jeffrey Byers Award for Best Poster Paper in Resist Materials and Processing Technology for 2009, to Xinyu Gu, Adam Berro, Younjin Cho, Kane Jen, Saul Lee, Tomoki Ngai, Toshiyuki Ogata, William Durand, and accord Willson of Univ. of Texas at Austin, Arunkumar Sundaresan, Jeffrey Lancaster, Steffen Jockusch, and Nicholas Turro of Columbia Univ., and Paul Zimmerman of Intel Corp.

    The Willson award is sponsored by AZ Electronic Materials and Rohm Haas Electronic Materials, and the Byers award is sponsored by Tokyo Electron.

    Three conferences opened sessions Monday morning, and two of several panel discussions scheduled for the week closed the day. Richard Silver and Christopher Soles of NIST moderated a panel on Self-Assembling Molecules for Semiconductor Pattering and Nanoelectronics. Bryan Kasprowicz of Photronics Inc. and Franklin Kalk of Toppan Photomasks moderated the BACUS panel on future potential technologies, including EUV, NIL, double patterning and direct wire.

    Plenaries Explore Past and Future of Lithographic Technologies

    The plenary session for the 35th year of this symposium got underway with three presentations exploring the past successes and future prospects of lithographic technologies.

    Kazuo Ushida of Nikon presented his predictions for lithography's future, promising not to bring disagreeable news, because as the Japanese proverb goes, "The priest who preaches foul tenet shall breathe reborn as a fungus." He predicted that although the next few years peer biddable for fab equipment, it's very unlikely that this industry will recur to its former levels. Current thought, said Ushida, is that double patterning will pick lithography from the 32 to the 22-nm node, and EUV will pick it from the 22 to the 16 nm node. However - what, he asked, if EUV comes too late?

    While the prospects of EUV are considerable for advancing to the 22-nm node, Ushida declared that EUV quiet has a long route to meander because 100x improvement is required in mask defectivity to achieve such feature reduction. Should evolution of the necessary mask infrastructure start today, he predicted, it would pick 2 years for tools to breathe available and another 2 years to fully understand defects before EUV could breathe a reality in 2014 - long after it would breathe needed for the 22-nm node. Because of this, one needs to peer at alternative means of achieving the 22-nm node.

    He presented three alternatives: spacer double patterning, pitch splitting double patterning, and line-cutting lithography, the eventual of which enables ArF extension to 16 nm. Because EUV is too far off to breathe practical, he said that 22 nm requires double patterning with immersion, which in circle will require lofty overlay accuracy, CD uniformity, excellent throughput, low cost of ownership, posthaste installation, and the possibility of reuse for next generations. He then presented Nikon's solution to everything of these issues - the NSR-S620D - which has less than 2 nm overlay and 200 wph throughput and allows a modular approach to its construction enabling multigenerational use. Although 2010 and 2011 will breathe biddable years as the industry recovers, Ushida asserted that EUV challenges in mask infrastructure will retard its implementation until the 16-nm node.

    Eric Chen of Silver Lake Partners then gave an overview of the economics behind the lithography industry and voiced his concerns that without a change in global balances, the economy will never fully recover. However, he suggested that with a change in paradigms, there is considerable market potential. The root causes, he said, of the worst global economic conditions in recorded economic history (the 2009 recession) were the ease of liquidity, the US existent estate market bubble, and the widespread excess leverage.

    These created a pass that is just now seemingly stabilizing, but they aren't out of the woods yet. The eventual 20 years has seen an unprecedented integration of global economies that absorb resulted in an imbalance in the world economy. Chen asserted that this model is broken, and without normalized growth in developing economies as well as the driving down of debt and consumption in developed countries, the economy will not rebalance.

    Chen reminded the audience that a recession in the tech sector was seen most recently in 2000-2001 when the equity bubble burst (as opposed to 2009's debt bubble). Unfortunately, debt bubbles are more severe and harder to regain from. Two things drive economic growth - demographic changes and changes in productivity. Since productivity increases are driven by technology, Chen said, technology advances will likely rescue the day and drive current growth.

    Chen then reviewed a number of macro trends in technology. First off, he described the evolution of software into a service economy, such as the change from CDs and personal programs to iPhone apps and cloud computing driving mobile and telecom. He pointed out the increasing pace and scale of antiseptic technology, and then summarized the growing threat of Asia, noting its ascend as an innovation leader as it moves from the inexpensive commercialization of technology to encompassing low-cost R & D on the leading close as well.

    Sam Sivakumar of Intel then presented a talk that looked at the evolution of lithography as a play in four acts, starring the triumvirate of lithography, design, and process architecture.

    In Act I: The far-off Past, Sivakumar considered the .25 micron and earlier technology and institute that during that time period, lithography delivered design intent, but did not influence design or architecture. In Act II: The Recent Past (down to 65 nm), lithography then delivered design intent with some difficulty, such as in rule-based serif placement and hotspot determination. In present time, Act III (45-32 nm), lithography is now interacting closely with design and process architecture, profoundly influencing methodology in both areas.

    As for the future, he predicted (1) lithography will play a central role in defining design methodology and process architecture; (2) mask technology has become and will continue to breathe an integral allotment of lithography planning for the next generation; and (3) managing the cost of patterning will breathe the existent challenge in the near term. But lithography has become a full, equal ally with design and process integration and the quality of their interaction will determine the industry's success or failure.

    Sculpteo, FICEP S3, ZiggZagg, and Multi Jet Fusion: HP Global Innovation pinnacle Highlights Real-World 3D Printing Installations, Implications | existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Beautiful Barcelona houses a charming intersection of gothic architecture, twentieth century art, and burgeoning twenty-first century technology. Serving as the site of eventual week’s insightful HP Global Innovation Summit, the city welcomed journalists and analysts from around the world to share in two days of insights into the heart of disruptive technologies. 3D printing and immersive computing depict keys to the future of disruption — and to Industry 4.0. Never content to meander along for the journey, global mainstay HP Inc. is working to secure a driver’s seat to this future, focusing on reinventing for this onward momentum.

    While the first day of the pinnacle focused on HP and its approaches and offerings, the second day featured customer and ally stories highlighting real-world implementation of 3D printing and immersive computing technologies. With rising global installations of Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) 3D printing technology, partners including the newly-opened International Advanced Manufacturing 3DHUB (IAM 3DHUB) serve as viable examples of additive manufacturing in utilize today. During the summit, reports from France-based Sculpteo, Barcelona-based FICEP S3,  and Belgium-based ZiggZagg provided further first-hand experiences bringing MJF to the everyday of industry.

    A 3D printing panel opened the morning, as Vice President and generic Manager of Multi Jet Fusion Ramon Pastor moderated a session including Sculpteo CEO and Co-Founder Clément Moreau, FICEP S3 Director Nuno Neves, and ZiggZagg CEO Stijn Paridaens.

    3D Printing Panel L-R: Paridaens, Neves, Moreau, Pastor

    “We started with 3D printing out of necessity, to design current machinery, innovative machinery; they had a lot of troubles getting optimal geometries by machining, so they adopted 3D printing,” Neves explained of his company’s approach to incorporating additive manufacturing. “Now they Do R&D in additive manufacturing for other companies, helping other companies accumulate to where they are now. We’ve been here eight years, and doing 3D printing for a year and a half — it was HP who introduced us to 3D printing.”

    ZiggZagg has been on the market now for about seven years, and started working with HP’s 3D printers about a year ago. The company went from one machine to six machines over the eventual twelve months, and Paridaens celebrated that they contemplate “a lot more to come; they contemplate a huge market opening up with this technology.”

    Sculpteo, which started with 3D printing for rapid prototyping, now incorporates the technology throughout its operations alongside other manufacturing technologies and uses 3D printing for mass production.

    “We are a manufacturing center, not that much a design center; their customers Do pretty much everything,” Moreau noted, showing a 3D printed helmet Sculpteo created using HP’s technology. “Multi Jet Fusion for this character of product is definitely the only biddable possibility that you have. This is a current character of product, a current character of geometry — you cannot invent this by injection molding.”

    Geometries, strength, and charge points were the major factors that each of the three kept returning to, as Neves celebrated that making one of their Da Vinci Paint Machines using MJF eliminates about 2,000 molds and that, effectively, the company’s investment into the industrial 3D printer was reutrned through the course of making just one machine.

    “I agree that charge is one of the reasons to adopt MJF,” Paridaens said. “We are planning to purchase an additional five printers by the close of the year… They add some sort of a value to a allotment that helps the customer that can only breathe produced by 3D printing… Really making now the strategy of mass customization and mass production, they contemplate a large market opening up… As of now, I believe customers are quiet not ready if you meander birthright toward them, but if you absorb large concerns, large companies” employing the technology, adoption becomes more likely. “Also current materials coming up are one of the key factors why they decided to adopt this technology.”

    Trust, Pastor underscored, is “key to adoption” for current technologies. In many sectors, such as engineering, potential adopters are often risk-averse and prefer to linger to tried-and-true techniques in which they trained — even if that training was decades ago. Learning the intricacies of a current approach requires significant dedication, as, for example, design for additive manufacture (DfAM) represents a wholly current approach distinct from traditional design for machining or other subtractive technologies. Dedicating time, floorspace, and other resources to a current suite of technologies requires faith that the process will breathe worth it. Pastor asked the gathered executives about their thoughts on the key factors to unlock the market and accelerate adoption.

    “Company engineers are the key factor, they are the ones making the designs,” Paridaens said. “We contemplate in Belgium that education is now keeping up, kids in college are introduced to the technology. When they meander to the customer, they say, ‘We absorb done it this route for decades, let’s Do it this way.’ It’s a matter of trust. It needs to breathe proven.”

    Building on that response, Neves added, “People support designing parts the route they’ve always done it… With MJF, what’s hardest is getting people to actually come, to contemplate the product, touch it with their hands. They close up giving away a lot of samples… The key word is implementation… If you support doing things the route you’ve been doing them, if you design as you’ve been designing, you won’t design anything new.”

    Neves celebrated as well that truly understanding the technology and its capabilities allows for informed design that enables the birthright design the first time. While 3D printing famously speeds iteration and prototyping processes, understanding the control of dimensional precision — as well as how a allotment will cool, and so shrink or expand — allows for a speedier time to market for final parts production. DfAM requires significant attention and energy, but once through the learning curve, proves itself with a posthaste ROI and ensuing profit, Neves added later when they sat down for a lengthier conversation.

    During the panel, Pastor asked Moreau, Neves, and Paridaens to “open your crystal balls for a peer into how you contemplate the future” and what challenges 3D technologies will absorb in unveiling this future.

    “3D printing, or additive manufacturing, really becomes a manufacturing technology for everyone,” Moreau began.

    “One key thing, they learn that education is key, design is key, software is also very primary — the route you organize a factory software-wise is very important. An additive manufacturing factory is not just a factory with additive manufacturing; it’s something you need to wield very carefully. You cannot organize a short-run production factory in exactly the same route you would organize a mass production factory. current software tools need to breathe involved and imlemented. In this way, I contemplate they can absorb additive manufacturing factories everywhere, in service bureaus as well as in customer hands.”

    Sculpteo, for its part, certainly understands the wide reach of 3D printing, as its global operations are up and running to serve a broad variety of customers with a variety of manufacturing technologies. Late eventual year, the company introduced its Fabpilot software, designed first for internal utilize to connect operations at its Paris and San Francisco facilities, and broadened for customer utilize to smooth workflows for 3D printing for production.

    Moreau discusses details a of a 3D printed helmet

    Neves underscored the significance of software, pile on Moreau’s point. More accurate simulation is a specific need for the future of additive manufacturing, as current solutions “don’t always hold up.” As an example, he pointed to a allotment from FICEP that breaks at a 20 kilogram load; “SOLIDWORKS says it should shatter at 16 kg; on the one side this is good, it’s stronger than they think; on the other hand, they utilize more material than they need to because of this.” Understanding the exact load capabilities is necessary for designing for the requisite might of a given part, including the amount of material. Simulation is certainly in focus for many software companies in the 3D space, and Neves’ crystal ball reading on this front aligns well here.

    Looking more deeply into his crystal ball, Neves celebrated embedded electronics as a next gigantic thing for 3D printing. This evolution is held back not only by today’s additive manufacturing capabilities, but by industry standardization in the shape of a common connector for sensors.

    “This will breathe a lot of work, and everyone has to toil together,” he noted. “HP has to toil with its customers to basically evangelize this industry. Once they invent parts for a customer, they are a iterate customer. This is quite nice. It’s getting this person, this company, to pick the responsibility, the ‘Yeah, I want to try this.'”

    Speaking as well to the future in a exam questions mp;A with the gathered attendees, Moreau added that another trend Sculpteo is seeing comes in the shape of requested materials. flexible and food- and skin-contact safe materials are at the top of the request list. FICEP and ZiggZagg Do most of their 3D printing toil in HP’s available materials, with PA 12 preeminent for both at present. Future materials offerings hold considerable interest to both of these companies, but PA 12 is expected to remain a mainstay even as additional, particularly more flexible, materials emerge.

    “What else I would dote to contemplate is metal, but that’s a different machine,” Neves said — and indeed, HP has announced its intent to offer a metal 3D printing system.

    An challenging and primary issue that Paridaens raised as well was in response to a question in which it was suggested that additive manufacturing may pick the status of traditional techniques.

    “It’s comical how you utilize the word ‘replace.’ I don’t contemplate additive manufacturing will replace traditional manufacturing — it will add to traditional manufacturing,” he said. “It’s not the holy grail. It’s something that can assist in a prototyping stage up to the production stage.”

    3D printing is, indeed, a manufacturing technology, not a magical retort (or, going back to the days of lofty hype, a Replicator from the Enterprise). Recognizing the complementary nature of these technologies for industry is a key allotment of the adoption and education process, and Paridaens’ underscoring this messaging in a discussion of real-world applications was a well-placed reminder that disruption doesn’t necessarily addupto full-on displacement.

    Following this panel discussion, immersive computing took heart stage with insights in real-world applications for personalized footwear.

    I also sat down for longer conversations with Paridaens and Neves later, including a visit to FICEP’s facility outside Barcelona, for additional insights into their implementation of 3D printing into their workflow and strategic approaches — linger tuned for these interviews and more from my whirlwind time in Barcelona.

    Discuss HP, Multi Jet Fusion, the future of manufacturing, and other 3D printing topics at or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

    [All photos: Sarah Goehrke]

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    Wordpress : :

    Back to Main Page
    About Killexams exam dumps | |